Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 5:10:1272755.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1272755. eCollection 2023.

ChatGPT and scientific papers in veterinary neurology; is the genie out of the bottle?

Samira Abani  1   2 , Holger Andreas Volk  1   2 , Steven De Decker  3 , Joe Fenn  3 , Clare Rusbridge  4 , Marios Charalambous  1 , Rita Goncalves  5 , Rodrigo Gutierrez-Quintana  6 , Shenja Loderstedt  7 , Thomas Flegel  7 , Carlos Ros  8 , Thilo von Klopmann  9 , Henning Christian Schenk  10 , Marion Kornberg  11 , Nina Meyerhoff  1 , Andrea Tipold  1   2 , Jasmin Nicole Nessler  1
Affiliations

ChatGPT and scientific papers in veterinary neurology; is the genie out of the bottle?

Samira Abani et al. Front Vet Sci. .
No abstract available

Keywords: ChatGPT; artificial intelligence (AI); ethics; generative AI; integrity; machine learning; plagiarism; scientific writing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Presents the performance of specialist reviewers in identifying ChatGPT®-generated scientific manuscripts vs. original published manuscripts in three tests, each containing two stages; the initial assessment, referred to as abstract detection, and the final assessment, which includes the introduction with references. The reviewers' assessments are represented using colors, with red indicating “Incorrect” (misidentification), green indicating “Correct” (accurate identification), and yellow indicating “Uncertain” (indicating uncertainty). Reviewers demonstrated a better performance in identifying ChatGPT®-generated manuscripts in Test 2 (the highly familiar subject of steroid-responsive meningitis-arteritis in dogs) vs. Test 1 (SARS-CoV-2 detection dogs) and Test 3 (Cannabinoid receptors in canine epilepsy), which were referred to as less familiar and moderately familiar subjects. In the final assessment, reviewers demonstrated improved performance in three tests, indicating that the reviewers were able to refine their assessments and make more accurate conclusions by incorporating specific information and references.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Wodecki B. UBS: ChatGPT May Be the Fastest Growing App of All Time. (2023). Available online at: https://aibusiness.com/nlp/ubs-chatgpt-is-the-fastest-growing-app-of-all... (accessed August 1, 2023).
    1. Callaway E. How generative AI is building better antibodies. Nature. (2023) 617:235. 10.1038/d41586-023-01516-w - DOI - PubMed
    1. Generative Models . Available online at: https://openai.com/research/generative-models (accessed July 21, 2023).
    1. Huang K. Alarmed by A.I. Chatbots, Universities Start Revamping How They Teach. The New York Times. (2023). Available online at: nytimes.com (accessed July 7, 2023).
    1. OpenAI . Available online at: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/16/technology/chatgpt-artificial-intelli... (accessed July 7, 2023).

LinkOut - more resources