Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Dec;29(1):2270707.
doi: 10.1080/13814788.2023.2270707. Epub 2023 Oct 23.

Clinical diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: An observational study of respiratory tract infection in primary care in the early phase of the pandemic

Alike W van der Velden  1 , Milensu Shanyinde  2 , Emily Bongard  2 , Femke Böhmer  3 , Slawomir Chlabicz  4 , Annelies Colliers  5 , Ana García-Sangenís  6 , Lile Malania  7 , Jozsef Pauer  8 , Angela Tomacinschii  9 , Ly-Mee Yu  2 , Katherine Loens  10 , Margareta Ieven  10 , Theo J Verheij  1 , Herman Goossens  10 , Akke Vellinga  11 , Christopher C Butler  2
Affiliations
Observational Study

Clinical diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: An observational study of respiratory tract infection in primary care in the early phase of the pandemic

Alike W van der Velden et al. Eur J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, GPs had to distinguish SARS-CoV-2 from other aetiologies in patients presenting with respiratory tract infection (RTI) symptoms on clinical grounds and adapt management accordingly.

Objectives: To test the diagnostic accuracy of GPs' clinical diagnosis of a SARS-CoV-2 infection in a period when COVID-19 was a new disease. To describe GPs' management of patients presenting with RTI for whom no confirmed diagnosis was available. To investigate associations between patient and clinical features with a SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods: In April 2020-March 2021, 876 patients (9 countries) were recruited when they contacted their GP with symptoms of an RTI of unknown aetiology. A swab was taken at baseline for later analysis. Aetiology (PCR), diagnostic accuracy of GPs' clinical SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, and patient management were explored. Factors related to SARS-CoV-2 infection were determined by logistic regression modelling.

Results: GPs suspected SARS-CoV-2 in 53% of patients whereas 27% of patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. True-positive patients (23%) were more intensively managed for follow-up, antiviral prescribing and advice than true-negatives (42%). False negatives (5%) were under-advised, particularly for social distancing and isolation. Older age (OR: 1.02 (1.01-1.03)), male sex (OR: 1.68 (1.16-2.41)), loss of taste/smell (OR: 5.8 (3.7-9)), fever (OR: 1.9 (1.3-2.8)), muscle aches (OR: 2.1 (1.5-3)), and a known risk factor for COVID-19 (travel, health care worker, contact with proven case; OR: 2.7 (1.8-4)) were predictive of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Absence of loss of taste/smell, fever, muscle aches and a known risk factor for COVID-19 correctly excluded SARS-CoV-2 in 92.3% of patients, whereas presence of 3, or 4 of these variables correctly classified SARS-CoV-2 in 57.7% and 87.1%.

Conclusion: Correct clinical diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, without POC-testing available, appeared to be complicated.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; diagnostic accuracy; prediction; respiratory tract infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References

    1. Dunlop C, Howe A, Li D, et al. The coronavirus outbreak: the Central role of primary care in emergency preparedness and response. Br J Gen Pract Open. 2020;4(1):bjgpopen20X101041. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101041. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rawaf S, Allen LN, Stigler FL, et al. Lessons on the COVID-19 pandemic, for and by primary care professionals worldwide. Eur J Gen Pract. 2020;26(1):129–133. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2020.1820479. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krist AH, DeVoe JE, Cheng A, et al. Redesigning primary care to address the COVID-19 pandemic in the midst of the pandemic. Ann Fam Med. 2020;18(4):349–354. doi: 10.1370/afm.2557. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van der Velden AW, Bax EA, Bongard E, et al. Primary care for patients with respiratory tract infection before and early on in the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational study in 16 European countries. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e049257. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049257. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pidd H, Garside J. ‘We had zero information’: GPs in the dark over Covid-19 tests. [Cited 2023 June 13]. Available from: The Guardian 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/06/we-have-had-zero-informati....

Publication types