Coexisting picoplankton experience different relative grazing pressures across an ocean productivity gradient
- PMID: 37871180
- PMCID: PMC10622918
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2220771120
Coexisting picoplankton experience different relative grazing pressures across an ocean productivity gradient
Abstract
Picophytoplankton populations [Prochlorococcus, Synechococcus (SYN), and picoeukaryotes] are dominant primary producers in the open ocean and projected to become more important with climate change. Their fates can vary, however, with microbial food web complexities. In the California Current Ecosystem, picophytoplankton biomass and abundance peak in waters of intermediate productivity and decrease at higher production. Using experimental data from eight cruises crossing the pronounced CCE trophic gradient, we tested the hypothesis that these declines are driven by intensified grazing on heterotrophic bacteria (HBAC) passed to similarly sized picophytoplankton via shared predators. Results confirm previously observed distributions as well as significant increases in bacterial abundance, cell growth, and grazing mortality with primary production. Mortalities of picophytoplankton, however, diverge from the bacterial mortality trend such that relative grazing rates on SYN compared to HBAC decline by 12-fold between low and high productivity waters. The large shifts in mortality rate ratios for coexisting populations are not explained by size variability but rather suggest high selectivity of grazer assemblages or tightly coupled tradeoffs in microbial growth advantages and grazing vulnerabilities. These findings challenge the long-held view that protistan grazing mainly determines overall biomass of microbial communities while viruses uniquely regulate diversity by "killing the winners".
Keywords: Synechococcus; grazing mortality; growth rate; heterotrophic bacteria; shared predation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interest.
Figures




Comment in
-
Planktonic predator selectivity: Eating local with global implications.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Nov 28;120(48):e2317302120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2317302120. Epub 2023 Nov 15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023. PMID: 37967209 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Chisholm S. W., "Phytoplankton size" in Primary Productivity and Biogeochemical Cycles in the Sea, Falkowski P. G., Woodhead A. D., Eds. (Plenum Press, New York, 1992), pp. 213–237.
-
- Agawin N. S., Duarte C. M., Agustí S., Nutrient and temperature control of the contribution of picoplankton to phytoplankton biomass and production. Limnol. Oceanogr. 45, 591–600 (2000).
-
- Bopp L., et al. , Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century: Projections with CMIP5 models. Biogeosciences 10, 6225–6245 (2013).
-
- Moore J. K., et al. , Sustained climate warming drives declining marine biological productivity. Science 359, 1139–1143 (2018). - PubMed
-
- Flombaum P., Wang W. L., Primeau F. W., Martiny A. C., Global picophytoplankton niche partitioning predicts overall positive response to ocean warming. Nat. Geosci. 13, 116–120 (2020).
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous