In-hospital outcomes by insurance type among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction in New South Wales public hospitals
- PMID: 37872627
- PMCID: PMC10594777
- DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-02030-1
In-hospital outcomes by insurance type among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction in New South Wales public hospitals
Abstract
Background: International evidence suggests patients receiving cardiac interventions experience differential outcomes by their insurance status. We investigated outcomes of in-hospital care according to insurance status among patients admitted in public hospitals with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods: We conducted a cohort study within the Australian universal health care system with supplemental private insurance. Using linked hospital and mortality data, we included patients aged 18 + years admitted to New South Wales public hospitals with AMI and undergoing their first PCI from 2017-2020. We measured hospital-acquired complications (HACs), length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality among propensity score-matched private and publicly funded patients. Matching was based on socio-demographic, clinical, admission and hospital-related factors.
Results: Of 18,237 inpatients, 30.0% were privately funded. In the propensity-matched cohort (n = 10,630), private patients had lower rates of in-hospital mortality than public patients (odds ratio: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.45-0.77; approximately 11 deaths avoided per 1,000 people undergoing PCI procedures). Mortality differences were mostly driven by STEMI patients and those from major cities. There were no significant differences in rates of HACs or average LOS in private, compared to public, patients.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest patients undergoing PCI in Australian public hospitals with private health insurance experience lower in-hospital mortality compared with their publicly insured counterparts, but in-hospital complications are not related to patient health insurance status. Our findings are likely due to unmeasured confounding of broader patient selection, socioeconomic differences and pathways of care (e.g. access to emergency and ambulatory care; delays in treatment) that should be investigated to improve equity in health outcomes.
Keywords: Health insurance; Healthcare disparities; Hospitals; Myocardial infarction; Percutaneous coronary intervention.
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Heart, stroke and vascular disease—Australian facts [internet]. Canberra: AIHW; 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 1]. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/heart-stroke-vascular-diseases/hsvd-facts.
-
- Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National core, hospital-based outcome indicator specification 2019. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2019. p. 165. Report No. Version 3.
-
- Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: executive summary: a report of the american college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation. 2011;124(23):2574–2609. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823a5596. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Agarwal M, Agrawal S, Garg L, Mohananey D, Garg A, Bhatia N, et al. National trends in the incidence, management, and outcomes of heart failure complications in patients hospitalized for st-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes. 2017;1(1):26–36. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
