Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 23;9(4):61.
doi: 10.3390/ijns9040061.

Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program: 10-Year Outcome and Follow-Up from a Screening Center in Germany

Affiliations

Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program: 10-Year Outcome and Follow-Up from a Screening Center in Germany

Kruthika Thangavelu et al. Int J Neonatal Screen. .

Abstract

Regular reporting of quality control is important in newborn hearing screening, ensuring early diagnosis and intervention. This study reports on a population-based newborn hearing screening program in North-Rhine, Germany and a hospital-based screening at a University Hospital for 2007-2016. The two-staged 'screening' and 'follow-up' program involving TEOAE and AABR recruited newborns through participating birth facilities. Results were sent to the regional tracking center, and the data were analyzed based on recommended benchmarks. The percentage of newborns from the participating birth facilities in the region increased from 1.4% in 2007 to 57.5% in 2016. The 10-year coverage rate for these newborns was 98.7%, the referral rate after a failed two-step screening was 3.4%, and the lost-to-follow-up rate was 1%. At the hospital, >95% of the screened newborns completed screening within 30 days, the 10-year referral rate was 5%, and 64% were referred within 3 months of age. The median time for screening completion was 6 days after birth, for referral it was 74 days after birth, and for diagnosis it was 55 days after birth. Regional-centralized tracking centers with uniform structure are necessary for proper quality control. Obligatory participation of birthing facilities and quality reports may improve performance, but the recommended quality criteria need considerable financial and infrastructural expenditure.

Keywords: benchmarks; hospital-based screening; newborn hearing screening; population-based screening; quality control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Two-staged newborn hearing screening program in North-Rhine. S1: screening phase 1; S2: screening phase 2; FU1: Follow-up phase 1; FU2: Follow-up phase 2; DSFC: designated screening and follow-up center; TEOAE: automated transient otoacoustic emissions; AABR: automated auditory brainstem response.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Newborn hearing screening at University Children’s Hospital for the years 2007–2016 with Benchmark indicators (BM) 1, 2, and 3.

References

    1. Mehra S., Eavey R.D., Keamy D.G., Jr. The epidemiology of hearing impairment in the United States: Newborns, children and adolescents. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2009;140:461–472. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.12.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morton C.C., Nance W.E. Newborn hearing screening—A silent revolution. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006;354:2151–2164. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra050700. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Wieringen A., Boudewyns A., Sangen A., Wouters J., Desloovere C. Unilateral congenital hearing loss in children: Challenges and potentials. Hear. Res. 2019;372:29–41. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.01.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO Deafness and Hearing Loss. [(accessed on 29 August 2021)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss.
    1. Schmucker C., Kapp P., Motschall E., Loehler J., Meerpohl J.J. Prevalence of hearing loss and use of hearing aids among children and adolescents in Germany: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1277. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7602-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources