Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 24;408(1):416.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03152-4.

Evaluation of an established colorectal robotic programme at an NHS district general hospital: audit of outcomes and systematic review of published data

Peter G Vaughan-Shaw  1 , Abraham S Joel  2 , Mohamed Farah  2 , Frank Ofoezie  2 , Deena Harji  3 , Maren Liane  2 , Saif Choudhary  2 , James T Royle  2 , Stephen Holtham  2 , Golam Farook  4
Affiliations

Evaluation of an established colorectal robotic programme at an NHS district general hospital: audit of outcomes and systematic review of published data

Peter G Vaughan-Shaw et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) offers potential advantages over traditional surgical approaches. This study aimed to assess outcomes from a district general hospital (DGH) robotic colorectal programme against published data.

Materials and methods: The robotic programme was established following simulator, dry/wet lab training, and proctoring. We performed a case series analysing technical, patient, and oncological outcomes extracted from a prospective database of colorectal RAS cases (2015-2022). A registered systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42022300773; PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE) of single-centre colorectal series from established robotic centres (n>200 cases) was completed and compared to local data using descriptive summary statistics. Risk of bias assessment was performed using an adapted version of the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool.

Results: Two hundred thirty-two RAS cases were performed including 122 anterior resections, 56 APERs, 19 rectopexies, and 15 Hartmann's procedures. The median duration was 325 (IQR 265-400) min. Blood loss was < 100 ml in 97% of cases with 2 (0.9%) cases converted to open. Complications (Clavien-Dindo 3-5) occurred in 19 (8%) patients, with 3 (1.3%) deaths in < 30 days. Length of stay was 7 (IQR 5-11) days. In 169 rectal cancer cases, there were 9 (5.3%) cases with a positive circumferential or distal margin and lymph node yield of 17 (IQR 13-24). A systematic review of 1648 abstracts identified 13 studies from established robotic centres, totaling 4930 cases, with technical, patient, and oncological outcomes comparable to our own case series.

Conclusions: Outcomes from our robotic colorectal programme at a UK DGH are comparable with the largest published case series from world-renowned centres. Training and proctoring together with rolling audit must accompany the expansion of robotic surgery to safeguard outcomes.

Keywords: Colorectal; Meta-analysis; Robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, Ikeda Y, Takahashi I, Abe R et al (2002) Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. Surg Endosc 16(8):1187–1191 - PubMed
    1. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784 - PubMed
    1. NBOCAP. The National Bowel Cancer Audit (NBOCA) Annual Report 2021. Viewed at https://www.nboca.org.uk/content/uploads/2022/02/NBOCA-2021-AR-Final.pdf . Accessed 01/12/2021
    1. Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, Quarati R, Testa S (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51(11):1627–1632 - PubMed
    1. Baek SJ, Kim SH, Cho JS, Shin JW, Kim J (2012) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea. World J Surg 36(11):2722–2729 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources