Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):1031.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11530-w.

Impact of the OncotypeDX score and HER2 RNA PCR levels on HER2-low IHC levels in primary and metastasized tumors

Affiliations

Impact of the OncotypeDX score and HER2 RNA PCR levels on HER2-low IHC levels in primary and metastasized tumors

Didi Feldman et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Purpose: One-half of hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer (BC) patients have low expression of HER2 (HER2-low) and may benefit from trastuzumab deruxtecan (TDXd). This study aimed to identify parameters associated with HER2-low levels in primary and metastatic tumors. We specifically sought to determine whether OncotypeDX and HER2 mRNA levels could identify patients who would otherwise be considered HER2-negative by immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Methods: This retrospective analysis of all consecutive HR + patients who underwent OncotypeDX from January 2004 to December 2020 was conducted in a single medical center (n = 1429). We divided HER2-negative cases into HER2-low (IHC = 1 + or 2 + and non-amplified fluorescent situ hybridization) and HER2-0 (IHC = 0). HER2 RT-PCR was evaluated from the OncotypeDX results.

Results: HER2-low cases exhibited significantly higher HER2 RT-PCR scores (p = 2.1e-9), elevated estrogen receptor (ER) levels (p = 0.0114), and larger tumor sizes compared to HER2-0 cases (> 2 cm; 36.6% vs. 22.1%, respectively, p < 0.00001). Primary tumors > 2 cm were more likely to be HER2-low (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.6317 to 2.6475, p < 0.0001). Metastatic BCs expressed higher HER2 IHC scores compared with primary BCs (Wilcoxon signed-rank, p = 0.046). HER2 IHC scores were higher for low-risk vs. medium-risk OncotypeDX (p = 0.0067). No other clinical or pathological parameters were associated with the increase in HER2 levels in the metastatic samples.

Conclusion: It might be beneficial to use clinical data from the primary tumor, including the HER2 RT-PCR score, to determine a HER2-low status.

Keywords: Breast cancer; HER2 low; HER2 negative; Oncotype; RT-PCR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Amir Sonnenblick is a consultant for Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Gilead, MSD, Astra-Zenca and Progenetics. He receives travel, accommodations and expenses from Neopharm, Celgene, Medison and Roche. He is on the speakers' bureau at Teva, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis and Eli Lilly and receives grant support from Novartis and Roche.

Shlomit Strulov Shachar is a consultant for Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, and MSD. She receives travel, accommodations and expenses from Pfizer, Gilead, Astra-Zeneca and Roche. She is on the speakers' bureau at Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Gilead, MSD, Astra-Zeneca and Progenetics.

The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Differences between HER2-0 and HER2-low in the OncotypeDX population. a,b HER2 RT-PCR significantly differentiates not only HER2-low from HER2-0 BC (p < 0.0001) but also between HER2 IHC = 0/1 + /2 + categories (p < 0.0001). The black line indicates the group mean. The density indicates the number of overlapping samples. c HER2-low cases in primary tumors expressed higher ER levels (p = 0.0114) and were larger d than HER2-0 cases (p < 0.00001) e Differences between HER2 RT-PCR and HER2 IHC results, stratified by tumor size groups. HER2 RT-PCR significantly differentiates between HER2 IHC scores, especially in > 2 cm tumors, but it does not contribute to the distinction in tumors < 1 cm. Medians are specified under each group
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Metastatic characteristics and differences in HER2 expression between primary and metastatic biopsies. a HER2 IHC scores in primary vs. metastatic BC for each patient in the paired study cohort. Metastatic BCs had a significantly higher HER2 IHC score than primary BCs (one-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank, p = 0.046). b Differences in HER2 IHC score by OncotypeDX category in primary and metastatic BCs, including all primary BC biopsies and unpaired metastatic BC biopsies. The low-risk OncotypeDX group had a higher IHC score than the medium-risk group (p = 0.0067). Dots represent means. c, d Transition of HER2 expression from primary to metastatic BC. Most of the patients gained or maintained some degree of HER2 expression (65.9%)

References

    1. Arnold M, Morgan E, Rumgay H, Mafra A, Singh D, Laversanne M, et al. Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040. Breast. 2022;66:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sonnenblick A, Fumagalli D, Sotiriou C, Piccart M. Is the differentiation into molecular subtypes of breast cancer important for staging, local and systemic therapy, and follow up? Cancer Treat Rev. 2014;40:1089–1095. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.07.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Engel RH, Kaklamani VG. HER2-positive breast cancer. Drugs. 2007;67:1329–1341. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767090-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ben-Dror J, Shalamov M, Sonnenblick A. The history of early breast cancer treatment. Genes (Basel) 2022;13:960. doi: 10.3390/genes13060960. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tarantino P, Gandini S, Nicolò E, Trillo P, Giugliano F, Zagami P, et al. Evolution of low HER2 expression between early and advanced-stage breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2022;163:35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.022. - DOI - PubMed