Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 25:28:100495.
doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100495. eCollection 2023 Oct.

Split-filter dual energy computed tomography radiotherapy: From calibration to image guidance

Affiliations

Split-filter dual energy computed tomography radiotherapy: From calibration to image guidance

Jens Edmund et al. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Background and purpose: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is an emerging technology in radiotherapy (RT). Here, we investigate split-filter DECT throughout the RT treatment chain as compared to single-energy CT (SECT).

Materials and methods: DECT scans were acquired with a tin-gold split-filter at 140 kV resulting in a low- and high-energy CT reconstruction (recon). Ten cancer patients (four head-and-neck (HN)​, three rectum​, two anal/pelvis and one abdomen) were DECT scanned without and with iodine administered. A cylindrical and an anthropomorphic HN phantom were scanned with DECT and 120 kV SECT. The DECT images generated were: 120 kV SECT-equivalent (CTmix), virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs), iodine map, virtual non-contrast (VNC), effective atomic number (Zeff), and relative electron density (ρe,w). The clinical utility of these recons was investigated for calibration, delineation, dose calculation and image-guided RT (IGRT).

Results: A calibration curve for 75 keV VMI had a root-mean-square-error (RMSE) of 34 HU in closest agreement with the RSME of SECT calibration. This correlated with a phantom-based dosimetric agreement to SECT of γ1%1mm > 98%. A 40 keV VMI recon was most promising to improve tumor delineation accuracy with an average evaluation score of 1.6 corresponding to "partial improvement". The dosimetric impact of iodine was in general < 2%. For this setup, VNC vs. non-contrast CTmix based dose calculations are considered equivalent. SECT- and DECT-based IGRT was in agreement within the setup uncertainty.

Conclusions: DECT-based RT could be a feasible alternative to SECT providing additional recons to support the different steps of the RT workflow.

Keywords: Calibration; Delineation accuracy; Dose calculation; Dual-energy computed tomography; Image guidance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Patrick Wohlfahrt is an employee of Siemens Healthineers within the CT research and development section.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Contrast-enhanced DECT recons for HN patient 2. Top: CTmix (left), VNC (αw, middle) and rho (ρe,w, right). Bottom: VMI at 40 keV (left), iodine map (αI, middle) and effective atomic number (Zeff, right). For the top row and 40 keV, the window (W)/level (L) is 580/50 HU, for iodine W/L is 150/35 HU. Zeff is shown in atomic numbers from 4 to 14. The contours shown are the GTV (red), spinal cord (dark green) and body outline (light green). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Compensation strategy to reduce the impact of anatomical changes between the native and contrast-enhanced (CE) DECT of a rectum patient with GTV (red), clinical target volume (CTV, pink), PTV (cyan) and body (green) contours. Left: native CTmix with air map (white). Middle: CE CTmix with air map (dark blue). Right: CE CTmix with native air map (white) assigned to air and non-overlapping air map volumes assigned to water (light blue) to reproduce native CTmix anatomical conditions. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mass density vs. CT number in HU for different DECT recons as indicated in the figure key (left). The SECT-based calibration curve in the TPS is indicated by closed circles and solid line. The largest spread in CT numbers is seen beyond 1 g/cc. Square insert is a zoom of the soft tissue region (right).

References

    1. Hounsfield G.N. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part 1. Description of system Br J Radiol. 1973;46:1016–1022. - PubMed
    1. Hounsfield G.N. Nobel lecture, 8 December 1979. Computed medical imaging J Radiol. 1980;61:459–468. - PubMed
    1. McCollough C.H., Leng S., Yu L., Fletcher J.G. Dual-and multi-energy CT: principles, technical approaches, and clinical applications. Radiology. 2015;276:637–653. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Elmpt W., Landry G., Das M., Verhaegen F. Dual energy CT in radiotherapy: Current applications and future outlook. Radiother Oncol. 2016;119:137–144. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.02.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wohlfahrt P., Möhler C., Hietschold V., Menkel S., Greilich S., Krause M., et al. Clinical Implementation of Dual-energy CT for Proton Treatment Planning on Pseudo-monoenergetic CT scans. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;97:427–434. doi: 10.1016/J.IJROBP.2016.10.022. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources