Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 16:2023:7282944.
doi: 10.1155/2023/7282944. eCollection 2023.

Lung Cancer Classification in Histopathology Images Using Multiresolution Efficient Nets

Affiliations

Lung Cancer Classification in Histopathology Images Using Multiresolution Efficient Nets

Sunila Anjum et al. Comput Intell Neurosci. .

Abstract

Histopathological images are very effective for investigating the status of various biological structures and diagnosing diseases like cancer. In addition, digital histopathology increases diagnosis precision and provides better image quality and more detail for the pathologist with multiple viewing options and team annotations. As a result of the benefits above, faster treatment is available, increasing therapy success rates and patient recovery and survival chances. However, the present manual examination of these images is tedious and time-consuming for pathologists. Therefore, reliable automated techniques are needed to effectively classify normal and malignant cancer images. This paper applied a deep learning approach, namely, EfficientNet and its variants from B0 to B7. We used different image resolutions for each model, from 224 × 224 pixels to 600 × 600 pixels. We also applied transfer learning and parameter tuning techniques to improve the results and overcome the overfitting problem. We collected the dataset from the Lung and Colon Cancer Histopathological Image LC25000 image dataset. The dataset acquisition consists of 25,000 histopathology images of five classes (lung adenocarcinoma, lung squamous cell carcinoma, benign lung tissue, colon adenocarcinoma, and colon benign tissue). Then, we performed preprocessing on the dataset to remove the noisy images and bring them into a standard format. The model's performance was evaluated in terms of classification accuracy and loss. We have achieved good accuracy results for all variants; however, the results of EfficientNetB2 stand excellent, with an accuracy of 97% for 260 × 260 pixels resolution images.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image samples from LC25000 dataset image. (a, b) Colon adenocarcinoma. (c, d) Colon benign tissue. (e, f) Lung adenocarcinoma. (g, h) Lung squamous cell carcinomas. (i) Benign lung tissue.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Index representation of the dataset image sample before preprocessing to the model's desired size.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Transfer learning schematic diagram.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Block diagram of the proposed work.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The basic idea of EfficientNet [16] is to carefully balance scale, the network width depth, and resolution if resources are available (https://ai.googleblog.com/2019/05/efficientnet-improving-accuracy-and.html).
Figure 6
Figure 6
EfficientNetB0 training and validation plot of accuracy and loss.
Figure 7
Figure 7
EfficientNetB1 training and validation plot of accuracy and loss.
Figure 8
Figure 8
EfficientNetB2 model training and validation plot of accuracy and loss.
Figure 9
Figure 9
EfficientNetB3 model training and validation plot of accuracy and loss.
Figure 10
Figure 10
EfficientNetB4 model training and validation plot of accuracy and loss.
Figure 11
Figure 11
EfficientNetB5 model training and validation plot of accuracy and loss.
Figure 12
Figure 12
EfficientNetB6 model training and validation plot of accuracy and loss.
Figure 13
Figure 13
EfficientNetB7 model training and validation plot of accuracy and loss.

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R. L., Torre L. A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians . 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hong S., Mok Y., Jeon C., Jee S. H., Samet J. M. Tuberculosis, smoking and risk for lung cancer incidence and mortality. International Journal of Cancer . 2016;139(11):2447–2455. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30384. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Teramoto A., Tsukamoto T., Kiriyama Y., Fujita H. Automated classification of lung cancer types from cytological images using deep convolutional neural networks. BioMed Research International . 2017;2017:6. doi: 10.1155/2017/4067832.4067832 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barker J., Hoogi A., Depeursinge A., Rubin D. L. Automated classification of brain tumor type in whole-slide digital pathology images using local representative tiles. Medical Image Analysis . 2016;30:60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2015.12.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ojansivu V., Linder N., Rahtu E., et al. Automated classification of breast cancer morphology in histopathological images. Diagnostic Pathology . 2013, September;8(S1):1–4. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-8-s1-s29. - DOI - PubMed