Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 20;25(1):20-26.
doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.04.005. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Effect of communication skills training on documentation of shared decision-making for patients with life-limiting illness: An observational study in an intensive care unit

Sharyn L Milnes  1   2   3 , Debra C Kerr  2 , Ana Hutchinson  2 , Nicholas B Simpson  1   3 , Yianni Mantzaridis  1 , Charlie Corke  1 , Michael Bailey  4 , Neil R Orford  1   3   4   5
Affiliations

Effect of communication skills training on documentation of shared decision-making for patients with life-limiting illness: An observational study in an intensive care unit

Sharyn L Milnes et al. Crit Care Resusc. .

Abstract

Objectives: This article aims to examine the association between a shared decision-making (SDM) clinical communication training program and documentation of SDM for patients with life-limiting illness (LLI) admitted to intensive care.

Methods: This article used a prospective, longitudinal observational study in a tertiary intensive care unit (ICU). Outcomes included the proportion of patients with SDM documented on an institutional Goals of Care Form during hospital admission, as well as characteristics, outcomes, and factors associated with an SDM admission.

Intervention: Clinical communication skills training (iValidate) and clinical support program are the intervention for this study.

Results: A total of 325 patients with LLI were admitted to the ICU and included in the study. Overall, 184 (57%) had an SDM admission, with 79% of Goals of Care Form completed by an iValidate-trained doctor. Exposure to an iValidate-trained doctor was the strongest predictor of an ICU patient with LLI having an SDM admission (odds ratio: 22.72, 95% confidence interval: 11.91-43.54, p < 0.0001). A higher proportion of patients with an SDM admission selected high-dependency unit-level care (29% vs. 12%, p < 0.001) and ward-based care (36% vs. 5%, p < 0.0001), with no difference in the proportion of patients choosing intensive care or palliative care. The proportion of patients with no deterioration plan was higher in the non-SDM admission cohort (59% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Clinical communication training that explicitly teaches identification of patient values is associated with improved documentation of SDM for critically ill patients with LLI. Understanding the relationship between improved SDM and patient, family, and clinical outcomes requires appropriately designed high-quality trials randomised at the patient or cluster level.

Keywords: Autonomy; Communication; Goal concordant care; Life-limiting illness; Shared decision-making; Values.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient flow and Goals of Care Form (GoCF). GoC, Goals of Care; LLI, life-limiting illness; MO, medical officer (doctor); SDM, shared decision-making.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Survival analysis of patients by shared decision-making admission status.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Fried T.R., Tinetti M.E., Iannone L., O'Leary J.R., Towle V., Van Ness P.H. Health outcome prioritization as a tool for decision making among older persons with multiple chronic conditions. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(20):1854–1856. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.424. 2011/11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hawkins N.A., Ditto P.H., Danks J.H., Smucker W.D. Micromanaging death: process preferences, values, and goals in end-of-life medical decision making. Gerontologist. 2005;45(1):107–117. - PubMed
    1. Heyland D.K., Heyland R., Dodek P., You J.J., Sinuff T., Hiebert T., et al. Discordance between patients stated values and treatment preferences for end-of-life care: results of a multicentre survey. BMJ Support Palliative Care. 2016 - PubMed
    1. Corke C., Gwini S.-M., Milnes S., de Jong B., Orford N. Treatment choice when faced with high risk of poor outcome–and response to decisions made by surrogates on their behalf. Med Res Arch. 2020;8(11)
    1. Scheunemann L.P., Cunningham T.V., Arnold R.M., Buddadhumaruk P., White D.B. How clinicians discuss critically ill patients' preferences and values with surrogates: an empirical analysis. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(4):757. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources