9-1-1 Activations from Ambulatory Care Centers: A Sicker Pediatric Population
- PMID: 37877361
- PMCID: PMC10694466
- DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X23006544
9-1-1 Activations from Ambulatory Care Centers: A Sicker Pediatric Population
Abstract
Background: Pediatric patients transferred by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) from urgent care (UC) and office-based physician practices to the emergency department (ED) following activation of the 9-1-1 EMS system are an under-studied population with scarce literature regarding outcomes for these children. The objectives of this study were to describe this population, explore EMS level-of-care transport decisions, and examine ED outcomes.
Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients zero to <15 years of age transported by EMS from UC and office-based physician practices to the ED of two pediatric receiving centers from January 2017 through December 2019. Variables included reason for transfer, level of transport, EMS interventions and medications, ED medications/labs/imaging ordered in the first hour, ED procedures, ED disposition, and demographics. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, X test, point biserial correlation, two-sample z test, Mann-Whitney U test, and 2-way ANOVA.
Results: A total of 450 EMS transports were included in this study: 382 Advanced Life Support (ALS) runs and 68 Basic Life Support (BLS) runs. The median patient age was 2.66 years, 60.9% were male, and 60.7% had private insurance. Overall, 48.9% of patients were transported from an office-based physician practice and 25.1% were transported from UC. Almost one-half (48.7%) of ALS patients received an EMS intervention or medication, as did 4.41% of BLS patients. Respiratory distress was the most common reason for transport (46.9%). Supplemental oxygen was the most common EMS intervention and albuterol was the most administered EMS medication. There was no significant association between level of transport and ED disposition (P = .23). The in-patient admission rate for transported patients was significantly higher than the general ED admission rate (P <.001).
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that pediatric patients transferred via EMS after activation of the 9-1-1 system from UC and medical offices are more acutely ill than the general pediatric ED population and are likely sicker than the general pediatric EMS population. Paramedics appear to be making appropriate level-of-care transport decisions.
Keywords: pediatric emergency department; pediatrics; prehospital transfers; urgent care.
Conflict of interest statement
Carl Schultz is the EMS medical director for the county in which the study took place. He was not involved in study design, data analysis, or data interpretation. All other authors declare none.
Figures
References
-
- Uddin SG, O’Connor KS, Ashman JJ. Physician Office Visits by Children for Well and Problem-Focused Care: United States, 2012. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Data Brief 2016(248):1–8. - PubMed
-
- Saidinejad M, Paul A, Gausche-Hill M, et al. Consensus statement on urgent care centers and retail clinics in acute care of children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019;35(2):138–142. - PubMed
-
- Olympia RP, Wilkinson R, Dunnick J, Dougherty BJ, Zauner D. Pediatric referrals to an emergency department from urgent care centers. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018;34(12):872–877. - PubMed
-
- Canares TL, Brown L, Slotkin RM, Garro A. Treating children at urgent care centers: a qualitative study to determine how providers perceive managing pediatric patients. RI Med J. 2014;98(1):48–53. - PubMed
-
- Fuchs S, Jaffe DM, Christoffel KK. Pediatric emergencies in office practices: prevalence and office preparedness. Pediatrics. 1989;83(6):931–939. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
