The Mortality Burden of Untreated Aortic Stenosis
- PMID: 37877909
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.796
The Mortality Burden of Untreated Aortic Stenosis
Abstract
Background: The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend the assessment and grading of severity of aortic stenosis (AS) as mild, moderate, or severe, per echocardiogram, and recommend aortic valve replacement (AVR) when the AS is severe.
Objectives: The authors sought to describe mortality rates across the entire spectrum of untreated AS from a contemporary, large, real-world database.
Methods: We analyzed a deidentified real-world data set including 1,669,536 echocardiographic reports (1,085,850 patients) from 24 U.S. hospitals (egnite Database, egnite). Patients >18 years of age were classified by diagnosed AS severity. Untreated mortality and treatment rates were examined with Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates, with results compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate hazards analysis was performed to assess associations with all-cause mortality.
Results: Among 595,120 patients with available AS severity assessment, the KM-estimated 4-year unadjusted, untreated, all-cause mortality associated with AS diagnosis of none, mild, mild-to-moderate, moderate, moderate-to-severe, or severe was 13.5% (95% CI: 13.3%-13.7%), 25.0% (95% CI: 23.8%-26.1%), 29.7% (95% CI: 26.8%-32.5%), 33.5% (95% CI: 31.0%-35.8%), 45.7% (95% CI: 37.4%-52.8%), and 44.9% (95% CI: 39.9%-49.6%), respectively. Results were similar when adjusted for informative censoring caused by treatment. KM-estimated 4-year observed treatment rates were 0.2% (95% CI: 0.2%-0.2%), 1.0% (95% CI: 0.7%-1.3%), 4.2% (95% CI: 2.0%-6.3%), 11.4% (95% CI: 9.5%-13.3%), 36.7% (95% CI: 31.8%-41.2%), and 60.7% (95% CI: 58.0%-63.3%), respectively. After adjustment, all degrees of AS severity were associated with increased mortality.
Conclusions: Patients with AS have high mortality risk across all levels of untreated AS severity. Aortic valve replacement rates remain low for patients with severe AS, suggesting that more research is needed to understand barriers to diagnosis and appropriate approach and timing for aortic valve replacement.
Keywords: aortic stenosis; aortic valve; aortic valve replacement; database; natural language processing.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Généreux has served as a consultant for, an advisor for, and received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic; has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific, GE Healthcare, iRhythm Technologies, OpSens, Siemens, and Teleflex; has served as a consultant for and PI of the Eclipse Trial for Cardiovascular System Inc; has served as a proctor for, received research grants from, and served as PI for the EARLY-TAVR and PROGRESS trials for Edwards Lifesciences; has equity in and served as a consultant for Pi-Cardia, Puzzle Medical, Saranas, and Soundbite Medical Inc; has served as a consultant for and received speaker fees from Shockwave; has served as a consultant for and PI of the ALTA Valve Feasibility study for 4C Medical; and has served as a consultant and advisor for egnite, Inc. Dr Sharma has served as a consultant and advisor for Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Philips, Siemens, and egnite, Inc. Dr Cubeddu has served on the Speakers Bureau for Abbott Laboratories, Edwards Lifesciences, and Gore Medical. Dr Thourani has served on the advisory board for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, Atricure, Cryolife, JenaValve, Shockwave, and Boston Scientific. Dr Makkar has received grant support/research contracts from Edwards Lifesciences and St Jude Medical; and has received consultant fees/honoraria and served on the Speakers Bureaus of Abbott Vascular, Cordis Corporation, and Medtronic. Dr Cohen has received research grant support from Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Medtronic, Philips, Zoll Medical, iRhythm, and Corvia; and has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Medtronic, and Corvia. Mr Dobbles and Dr Kwon have equity, stock(s), and/or options in and are employees of egnite, Inc. Dr Barnhart has equity, stock(s), and/or options in and was employed at egnite, Inc at the time of the study. Dr Pibarot has received institutional funding from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Pi-Cardia, Cardiac Success, and Roche Diagnostics for echocardiography core laboratory analyses, blood biomarker analyses, and research studies in the field of interventional and pharmacologic treatment of valvular heart diseases, for which he received no personal compensation. Dr Leon has received institutional clinical research grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Gillam has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Philips, Edwards Lifesciences, and egnite, Inc; and has core laboratory contracts (no direct compensation) with Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Abbott. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Comment in
-
Aortic Stenosis: A 6-Decade Odyssey.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Nov 28;82(22):2110-2112. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Oct 24. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 37877908 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Clinical journey for patients with aortic regurgitation: A retrospective observational study from a multicenter database.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jul;104(1):145-154. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31085. Epub 2024 May 19. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024. PMID: 38764317
-
Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: The PARTNER 3 Trial.Circulation. 2020 May 12;141(19):1527-1537. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044574. Epub 2020 Apr 10. Circulation. 2020. PMID: 32272848 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of Managing Provider Type on Severe Aortic Stenosis Management and Mortality.J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jul 5;11(13):e025164. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025164. Epub 2022 Jun 29. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35766279 Free PMC article.
-
Moderate aortic stenosis: culprit or bystander?Open Heart. 2022 Jan;9(1):e001743. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001743. Open Heart. 2022. PMID: 35074936 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 20;12(12):CD013319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013319.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31860123 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Clinical Outcomes According to Aortic Stenosis Management: Insights From Real-World Practice.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 19;13(22):e036657. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036657. Epub 2024 Nov 15. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 39548024 Free PMC article.
-
TAVR in older adults with cardiogenic shock: current practice and future direction.J Geriatr Cardiol. 2025 May 28;22(5):525-533. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2025.05.003. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2025. PMID: 40607133 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Perceval Valves in Older Patients: A Systematic Review.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jul 28;26(7):39463. doi: 10.31083/RCM39463. eCollection 2025 Jul. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025. PMID: 40776953 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Impact of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Improvement after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 21;13(13):3639. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133639. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38999205 Free PMC article.
-
Periprocedural care for frail older patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Mar 28;58:101665. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101665. eCollection 2025 Jun. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025. PMID: 40230500 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials