Characteristics and surgery outcomes of macular hole diagnosed after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair
- PMID: 37878036
- DOI: 10.1007/s00417-023-06259-y
Characteristics and surgery outcomes of macular hole diagnosed after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair
Abstract
Purpose: To report the characteristics and the visual and anatomical outcomes of secondary macular holes (SMHs) diagnosed after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair and their associated factors.
Methods: Retrospective, interventional case series. All consecutive patients who were diagnosed with SMH after RRD repair at Beijing Tongren eye center from January 2016 to April 2021 were included. Patients who had their primary RRD repair in other hospitals and were referred to our center after diagnosis of SMH were also included. The minimum follow-up time after RRD repair was 6 months.
Results: 37 SMHs were diagnosed within a series of 5696 RRDs. Including 24 eyes referred from other hospitals after the diagnosis of SMH, 61 eyes were included. The type of primary RRD repair surgery included 22/61 (36%) eyes with scleral buckling procedure (SBP) and 39/61 (64%) eyes with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). 21/61 (34%) eyes had recurrent RD. The median time to SMH diagnosis was 150 days (range, 7 ~ 4380 days). Macular hole (MH) closure was achieved in 77% eyes. Visual acuity (VA) improvement of at least 2 lines of Snellen's visual acuity was observed in 51% eyes. Final MH closure status was associated with preoperative MH diameter (for every 50 μm increment) (P = 0.046, OR = 0.875, 95%CI: 0.767 ~ 0.998). VA improvement was associated with final MH closure status (P = 0.009, OR = 8.742, 95%CI: 1.711 ~ 44.672). Final VA (logMAR) was associated with recurrent RD (P < 0.001, B = 0.663, 95%CI: 0.390 ~ 0.935), preoperative MH diameter (P = 0.001, B = 0.038, 95%CI: 0.017 ~ 0.058), VA at the time of SMH diagnosis (P < 0.001, B = 0.783, 95%CI: 0.557 ~ 1.009) and final MH closure status (P = 0.024, B = -0.345, 95%CI: -0.644 ~ -0.046). For patients without recurrent RD, VA improvement and final VA was associated with final MH closure status (P = 0.016 and P < 0.001, respectively), while for patients with recurrent RD, VA improvement or final VA did not associate with final MH closure status (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: For SMH diagnosed after RRD repair, final MH closure status was associated with preoperative MH diameter. Recurrent RD, larger preoperative MH diameter, worse VA at the time of SMH diagnosis and failed MH closure are predictive factors for worse final VA. Visual outcome is associated with final MH closure status in patients without recurrent RD, but not as so in patients with recurrent RD.
Keywords: Macular hole; Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment; Scleral buckling; Vitrectomy.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Moshfeghi AA, Salam GA, Deramo VA, Shakin EP, Ferrone PJ, Shakin JL et al (2003) Management of macular holes that develop after retinal detachment repair. Am J Ophthalmol 136(5):895–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00572-5 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Garcia-Arumi J, Boixadera A, Martinez-Castillo V, Zapata MA, Fonollosa A, Corcostegui B (2011) Macular holes after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: surgical management and functional outcome. Retina 31(9):1777–1782. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31820a69c3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Fabian ID, Moisseiev E, Moisseiev J, Moroz I, Barak A, Alhalel A (2012) Macular hole after vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 32(3):511–519. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31821f5d81 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Schlenker MB, Lam WC, Devenyi RG, Kertes PJ (2012) Understanding macular holes that develop after repair of retinal detachment. Can J Ophthalmol 47(5):435–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.05.001 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ersoz MG, Hocaoglu M, Sayman MI, Arf S, Karacorlu M (2021) Characteristics and management of macular hole developing after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Jpn J Ophthalmol 65(4):497–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-021-00833-9 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
