Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 27;117(3):187-194.
doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcad242.

Comprehensive validation of early diagnostic algorithms for myocardial infarction in the emergency department

Affiliations

Comprehensive validation of early diagnostic algorithms for myocardial infarction in the emergency department

M Tada et al. QJM. .

Abstract

Objective: To comprehensively evaluate diagnostic algorithms for myocardial infarction using a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay.

Patients and methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with suspected myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation from nine emergency departments in Japan. The diagnostic algorithms evaluated: (i) based on hs-cTnI alone, such as the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1-h or 0/2-h and High-STEACS pathways; or (ii) used medical history and physical findings, such as the ADAPT, EDACS, HEART, and GRACE pathways. We evaluated the negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity as safety measures, and proportion of patients classified as low or high-risk as an efficiency measure for a primary outcome of type 1 myocardial infarction or cardiac death within 30 days.

Results: We included 437 patients, and the hs-cTnI was collected at 0 and 1 hours in 407 patients and at 0 and 2 hours in 394. The primary outcome occurred in 8.1% (33/407) and 6.9% (27/394) of patients, respectively. All the algorithms classified low-risk patients without missing those with the primary outcome, except for the GRACE pathway. The hs-cTnI-based algorithms classified more patients as low-risk: the ESC 0/1-h 45.7%; the ESC 0/2-h 50.5%; the High-STEACS pathway 68.5%, than those using history and physical findings (15-30%). The High-STEACS pathway ruled out more patients (20.5%) by hs-cTnI measurement at 0 hours than the ESC 0/1-h and 0/2-h algorithms (7.4%).

Conclusions: The hs-cTnI algorithms, especially the High-STEACS pathway, had excellent safety performance for the early diagnosis of myocardial infarction and offered the greatest improvement in efficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.T. received non-financial support from Abbott Japan, Roche Diagnostics, and Siemens Healthineers during the conduct of the study. These organizations did not contribute to the study design, the data analysis, the manuscript preparation, or publication decision. H.T. has received research grants or honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, Biotronik Japan, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Novartis Japan, Medtronic Japan, Abbott Medical Japan, Medius Holdings, but all outside the study. N.L.M. has received research grants, honoraria or consultancy from Abbott Diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics, Siemens Healthineers, and LumiraDx, but none that supported this research. T.A.F. reports personal fees from DT Axis, Kyoto University Original, MSD and SONY, and a grant from Shionogi, outside the submitted work; In addition, T.A.F. has patents 2020-548587 and 2022-082495 pending, and intellectual properties for Kokoro-app licensed to Mitsubishi-Tanabe. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient flows. The research blood samples at presentation could not be collected from 17 patients due to overlooking to collect blood or mishandling. We stopped collecting research blood samples if patients had an emergency catheterization (deemed unnecessary at presentation but deemed necessary based on the course of events or troponin results afterwards) or hospitalization. ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CAG, coronary angiography; ECG, electrocardiography; hs-cTnI, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I; h, hours. The sum of a, b and 2 is 437.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Classified timings and proportions. Timing and proportion of patients for rule-out, rule-in and not classified. ADAPT, 2-Hour Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol to Assess Patients With Chest Pain Symptoms using Troponins; EDACS, Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score; GRACE, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events; HEART, History, Electrocardiography, Age, Risk factors, Troponin.

Similar articles

References

    1. Levy PD, Mahler SA.. Evaluating suspected acute MI in the emergency department: what is and what should never be. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74:495–7. - PubMed
    1. Twerenbold R, Neumann JT, Sorensen NA, Ojeda F, Karakas M, Boeddinghaus J, et al.Prospective validation of the 0/1-h algorithm for early diagnosis of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 72:620–32. - PubMed
    1. Chapman AR, Anand A, Boeddinghaus J, Ferry AV, Sandeman D, Adamson PD, et al.Comparison of the efficacy and safety of early rule-out pathways for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2017; 135:1586–96. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, Barthelemy O, Bauersachs J, Bhatt DL, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2021; 42:1289–367. - PubMed
    1. Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, Amsterdam E, Bhatt DL, Birtcher KK, et al.2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2021; 144:e368–e54. - PubMed