Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Nov:170:104419.
doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104419. Epub 2023 Oct 10.

Cognitive Therapy-as-Usual versus Cognitive Therapy plus the Memory Support Intervention for adults with depression: 12-month outcomes and opportunities for improved efficacy in a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Garret G Zieve  1 , Laurel D Sarfan  2 , Lu Dong  3 , Sondra S Tiab  4 , Melanie Tran  5 , Allison G Harvey  6
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cognitive Therapy-as-Usual versus Cognitive Therapy plus the Memory Support Intervention for adults with depression: 12-month outcomes and opportunities for improved efficacy in a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Garret G Zieve et al. Behav Res Ther. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: Patient memory for treatment is emerging as an important transdiagnostic mechanism of treatment outcomes. However, patient memory for treatment is limited. The Memory Support Intervention was developed to improve patient memory for treatment and thereby strengthen treatment outcomes. In this secondary analysis, the primary, preregistered aim was to test the 12-month follow-up outcomes of the Memory Support Intervention when used with cognitive therapy (CT + MS) for major depressive disorder, relative to CT-as-usual. The secondary, exploratory aim was to investigate opportunities to improve efficacy of the Memory Support Intervention.

Method: Adults (N = 178) with major depressive disorder were randomized to CT-as-usual or CT + MS. Therapist use of memory support and patient memory for treatment, depression symptoms, and overall functioning were measured in blind assessments.

Results: Findings did not support differences between treatment conditions at 12-month follow-up. Therapists used memory support strategies with a narrow subset of treatment contents, and similarly, patients recalled a narrow subset of treatment contents.

Conclusions: The findings highlight ways to strengthen the efficacy of the Memory Support Intervention, such as applying memory support strategies across a wider variety of treatment contents, which in turn, may boost patient recall and outcomes.

Keywords: Cognitive therapy; Depression; Memory; Memory support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest Dr. Harvey has received research support from the National Institutes of Health and book royalties from American Psychological Association, Guilford Press, and Oxford University Press. Drs. Sarfan and Dong have received research support from the National Institutes of Health. The other authors do not have interests to declare.

References

    1. Barile JP, Reeve BB, Smith AW, Zack MM, Mitchell SA, Kobau R, Cella DF, Luncheon C, & Thompson WW (2012). Monitoring population health for Healthy People 2020: Evaluation of the NIH PROMIS® Global Health, CDC Healthy Days, and satisfaction with life instruments. Quality of Life Research, 22(6), 1201–1211. 10.1007/s11136-012-0246-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, & Walker S (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI
    1. Beck JS (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
    1. Bruijniks SJE, DeRubeis RJ, Hollon SD, & Huibers MJH (2019). The potential role of learning capacity in cognitive behavior therapy for depression: A systematic review of the evidence and future directions for improving therapeutic learning. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(4), 668–692. 10.1177/2167702619830391 - DOI
    1. Cliff N. (1993). Dominance statistics: Ordinal analyses to answer ordinal questions. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 494–509. 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.494 - DOI

Publication types