Performance of Corvis ST Parameters Including Updated Stress-Strain Index in Differentiating Between Normal, Forme-Fruste, Subclinical, and Clinical Keratoconic Eyes
- PMID: 37879454
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.10.015
Performance of Corvis ST Parameters Including Updated Stress-Strain Index in Differentiating Between Normal, Forme-Fruste, Subclinical, and Clinical Keratoconic Eyes
Abstract
Purpose: This study seeks to evaluate the ability of the updated stress strain index (SSIv2) and other Corvis ST biomechanical parameters in distinguishing between keratoconus at different disease stages and normal eyes.
Design: Diagnostic accuracy analysis to distinguish disease stages.
Methods: 1084 eyes were included and divided into groups of normal (199 eyes), forme fruste keratoconus (FFKC, 194 eyes), subclinical keratoconus (SKC, 113 eyes), mild clinical keratoconus (CKC-Ⅰ, 175 eyes), moderate clinical keratoconus (CKC-Ⅱ, 204 eyes), and severe clinical keratoconus (CKC-Ⅲ, 199 eyes). Each eye was subjected to a Corvis ST examination to determine the central corneal thickness (CCT), biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP), SSIv2 (updated stress-strain index), and other 8 Corvis parameters including the stress-strain index (SSIv1), stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), first applanation time (A1T), Ambrósio relational thickness to the horizontal profile (ARTh), integrated inverse radius (IIR), maximum deformation amplitude (DAM), ratio between deformation amplitude at the apex and at 2 mm nasal and temporal (DARatio2), and Corvis biomechanical index (CBI). The sensitivity and specificity of these parameters in diagnosing keratoconus were analyzed through receiver operating characteristic curves.
Results: Before and after correction for CCT and bIOP, SSIv2 and ARTh were significantly higher and IIR and CBI were significantly lower in the normal group than in the FFKC group, SKC group and the 3 CKC groups (all P < .05). There were also significant correlations between the values of SSIv2, ARTh, IIR, CBI, and the CKC severity (all P < .05). AUC of SSIv2 was significantly higher than all other Corvis parameters in distinguishing normal eyes from FFKC, followed by IIR, ARTh and CBI.
Conclusion: Corvis ST's updated stress-strain index, SSIv2, demonstrated superior performance in differentiating between normal and keratoconic corneas, and between corneas with different keratoconus stages. Similar, but less pronounced, performance was demonstrated by the IIR, ARTh and CBI.
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
Early diagnosis of keratoconus using corneal biomechanics and OCT derived technologies.Eye Vis (Lond). 2025 May 12;12(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40662-025-00435-3. Eye Vis (Lond). 2025. PMID: 40350508 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biomechanical properties analysis of forme fruste keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 May;261(5):1311-1320. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05916-y. Epub 2022 Nov 28. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36441226
-
Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes.J Refract Surg. 2017 Sep 1;33(9):632-638. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170621-09. J Refract Surg. 2017. PMID: 28880339
-
Corneal biomechanics in normal and subclinical keratoconus eyes.BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov 15;23(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03215-6. BMC Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 37968616 Free PMC article.
-
Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in chinese patients.BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 20;21(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02102-2. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 34544392 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Diurnal variations in corneal biomechanics in healthy young adults.BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 26;25(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03913-3. BMC Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 40000951 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the Performance of Stress-Strain Index Versions 1 and 2 in Normal and Keratoconus Patients.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Mar 3;14(3):23. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.3.23. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025. PMID: 40136291 Free PMC article.
-
A Novel Approach to Fabricate Early Keratoconus Phantom Models.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Apr 1;14(4):18. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.4.18. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025. PMID: 40244577 Free PMC article.
-
Early diagnosis of keratoconus using corneal biomechanics and OCT derived technologies.Eye Vis (Lond). 2025 May 12;12(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40662-025-00435-3. Eye Vis (Lond). 2025. PMID: 40350508 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Strategies for Early Keratoconus Diagnosis: A Narrative Review of Evaluating Affordable and Effective Detection Techniques.J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 13;14(2):460. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020460. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 39860468 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous