Public Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Residential Neighborhoods
- PMID: 37879782
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.036
Public Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Residential Neighborhoods
Erratum in
-
Correction.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jan 2;83(1):290. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.11.011. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38171706 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Although one-half of all public out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) occur outside private homes in residential neighborhoods, their characteristics and outcomes remain unexplored.
Objectives: The authors assessed interventions before ambulance arrival and survival for public OHCA patients in residential neighborhoods.
Methods: Public OHCAs from Vienna (2018-2021) and Copenhagen (2016-2020) were designated residential neighborhoods or nonresidential areas. Interventions (cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], automated external defibrillator [AED] attached, and defibrillation) and 30-day survival were compared using a generalized estimation equation model adjusted for age and time of day and presented as ORs.
Results: We included 1,052 and 654 public OHCAs from Vienna and Copenhagen, respectively, and 68% and 55% occurred in residential neighborhoods, respectively. The likelihood of CPR, defibrillation, and survival in residential neighborhoods vs nonresidential areas (reference) were as follows: CPR Vienna, 73% vs 78%, OR: 0.78 (95% CI: 0.57-1.06), CPR Copenhagen, 83% vs 90%, OR: 0.54 (95% CI: 0.34-0.88), and CPR combined, 76% vs 84%, OR: 0.70 (95% CI: 0.53-0.90); AED attached Vienna, 36% vs 44%, OR: 0.69 (95% CI: 0.53-0.90), AED attached Copenhagen, 21% vs 43%, OR: 0.33 (95% CI: 0.24-0.48), and AED attached combined, 31% vs 44%, OR: 0.53 (95% CI: 0.42-0.65); defibrillation Vienna, 14% vs 20%, OR: 0.61 (95% CI: 0.43-0.87), defibrillation Copenhagen, 16% vs 36%, OR: 0.35 (95% CI: 0.24-0.51), and defibrillation combined, 15% vs 27%, OR: 0.46 (95% CI: 0.36-0.61); and 30-day survival rate Vienna, 21% vs 26%, OR: 0.84 (95% CI: 0.58-1.20), 30-day survival rate Copenhagen, 33% vs 44%, OR: 0.65 (95% CI: 0.47-0.90), and 30-day survival rate combined, 25% vs 36%, OR: 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58-0.93).
Conclusions: Two-thirds of public OHCAs occurred in residential neighborhoods with fewer resuscitative efforts before ambulance arrival and lower survival than in nonresidential areas. Targeted efforts to improve early CPR and defibrillation for public OHCA patients in residential neighborhoods are needed.
Keywords: automated external defibrillators; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; first responders; out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; sudden cardiac death; volunteer responders.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Grabmayr has received a research grant from Trygfonden. Dr Folke has received research grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF19OC0055142), TrygFonden, and the Laerdal Foundation. Dr Hansen has received research grants from TrygFonden, Helsefonden, the Laerdal Foundation, and the Capital Region of Denmark, Research Fund. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Comment in
-
Resuscitation From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Location, Location, Location.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Oct 31;82(18):1789-1791. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.798. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 37879783 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical