Implementing psychological interventions delivered by respiratory professionals for people with COPD. A stakeholder interview study
- PMID: 37880342
- PMCID: PMC10600190
- DOI: 10.1038/s41533-023-00353-8
Implementing psychological interventions delivered by respiratory professionals for people with COPD. A stakeholder interview study
Abstract
Implementing psychological interventions in healthcare services requires an understanding of the organisational context. We conducted an interview study with UK National Health Service stakeholders to understand the barriers and facilitators for implementing psychological interventions for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD). We used TANDEM as an exemplar intervention; a psychological intervention recently evaluated in a randomised controlled trial. Twenty participants providing care and/or services to people with COPD were purposively sampled from NHS primary/secondary care, and commissioning organisations. Participants were recruited via professional networks and referrals. Verbatim transcripts of semi-structured interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Four themes were identified: (1) Living with COPD and emotional distress affects engagement with physical and psychological services; (2) Resource limitations affects service provision in COPD; (3) Provision of integrated care is important for patient well-being; and (4) Healthcare communication can be an enabler or a barrier to patient engagement. People need support with physical and psychological symptoms inherent with COPD and healthcare should be provided holistically. Respiratory healthcare professionals are considered able to provide psychologically informed approaches, but resources must be available for training, staff supervision and service integration. Communication between professionals is vital for clear understanding of an intervention's aims and content, to facilitate referrals and uptake. There was widespread commitment to integrating psychological and physical care, and support of respiratory healthcare professionals' role in delivering psychological interventions but significant barriers to implementation due to concerns around resources and cost efficiency. The current study informs future intervention development and implementation.
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
S.J.C.T. is the chief investigator or co-investigator on multiple previous and current research grants from the UK National Institute for Health Research and CRC UK. H.P. is Associate Editor of npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine. H.P. was not involved in the journal’s review of, or decisions related to, this manuscript. Co-authors declare no further competing interests.
References
-
- Baxter, N. et al. Planning for Every Breath. National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Audit Programme: Primary Care Audit (Wales) 2015–17. Data Analysis and Methodology (RCP, 2020).
-
- Naylor, C. et al. Long-term conditions and mental health: the cost of co-morbidities. In Long-term conditions and mental health, 32 (The King’s Fund (kingsfund.org.uk), 2012).
-
- David, F. Implementing the Five Year Forward View for Mental Health (NHS England, 2017).
-
- Shaw, S., Rosen, R. & Rumbold, B. What is Integrated Care, 7, 1–23 (Nuffield Trust, 2011).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
