Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 15;67(11):e0073723.
doi: 10.1128/aac.00737-23. Epub 2023 Oct 26.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of first-line tuberculosis drugs rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide during pregnancy and postpartum: results from IMPAACT P1026s

Affiliations

Pharmacokinetics and safety of first-line tuberculosis drugs rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide during pregnancy and postpartum: results from IMPAACT P1026s

Marije Van Schalkwyk et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

Physiological changes during pregnancy may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of antituberculosis drugs. The International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network P1026s was a multicenter, phase IV, observational, prospective PK and safety study of antiretroviral and antituberculosis drugs administered as part of clinical care in pregnant persons living with and without HIV. We assessed the effects of pregnancy on rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide PK in pregnant and postpartum (PP) persons without HIV treated for drug-susceptible tuberculosis disease. Daily antituberculosis treatment was prescribed following World Health Organization-recommended weight-band dosing guidelines. Steady-state 12-hour PK profiles of rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide were performed during second trimester (2T), third trimester (3T), and 2-8 of weeks PP. PK parameters were characterized using noncompartmental analysis, and comparisons were made using geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CI). Twenty-seven participants were included: 11 African, 9 Asian, 3 Hispanic, and 4 mixed descent. PK data were available for 17, 21, and 14 participants in 2T, 3T, and PP, respectively. Rifampin and pyrazinamide AUC0-24 and C max in pregnancy were comparable to PP with the GMR between 0.80 and 1.25. Compared to PP, isoniazid AUC0-24 was 25% lower and C max was 23% lower in 3T. Ethambutol AUC0-24 was 39% lower in 3T but limited by a low PP sample size. In summary, isoniazid and ethambutol concentrations were lower during pregnancy compared to PP concentrations, while rifampin and pyrazinamide concentrations were similar. However, the median AUC0-24 for rifampin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide met the therapeutic targets. The clinical impact of lower isoniazid and ethambutol exposure during pregnancy needs to be determined.

Keywords: drug-susceptible tuberculosis; ethambutol; isoniazid; pharmacokinetics; pregnancy; pyrazinamide; rifampin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Median plasma concentration-time profiles of (A) rifampin, (B) isoniazid, (C) ethambutol, and (D) pyrazinamide during the second and third trimesters and postpartum (error bars indicate the IQR). The minimum target C max of each drug is represented by the horizontal dashed lines.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Box and whisker plots showing plasma AUC0-24 of (A) rifampin, (B) ethambutol, and (C) pyrazinamide during the second and third trimesters and postpartum (median, IQR, and range). The dots represent additional individual values. The minimum target AUC0-24 of rifampin and pyrazinamide is represented by the dashed lines.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Box and whisker plots showing plasma isoniazid (A) AUC0-24 and (B) C max for the total group and per metabolizer type during the second and third trimesters and postpartum (median, IQR, and range). The dots represent additional individual values. The minimum target AUC0-24 and C max are represented by the dashed lines.

References

    1. World Health Organization . 2022. Global tuberculosis report 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240061729. Retrieved 24 Aug 2023.
    1. Gupta A, Nayak U, Ram M, Bhosale R, Patil S, Basavraj A, Kakrani A, Philip S, Desai D, Sastry J, Bollinger RC, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Medical College-Johns Hopkins University Study Group . 2007. Postpartum tuberculosis incidence and mortality among HIV-infected women and their infants in Pune, India, 2002-2005. Clin Infect Dis 45:241–249. doi: 10.1086/518974 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zumla A, Bates M, Mwaba P. 2014. The neglected global burden of tuberculosis in pregnancy. Lancet Glob Health 2:e675–6. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70338-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sugarman J, Colvin C, Moran AC, Oxlade O. 2014. Tuberculosis in pregnancy: an estimate of the global burden of disease. Lancet Glob Health 2:e710–6. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70330-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Figueroa-Damián R, Arredondo-García JL. 2001. Neonatal outcome of children born to women with tuberculosis. Arch Med Res 32:66–69. doi: 10.1016/s0188-4409(00)00266-6 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms