Tracheal Intubation by Advanced Practice Registered Nurses in Pediatric Critical Care: Retrospective Study From the National Emergency Airway for Children Registry (2015-2019)
- PMID: 37882620
- PMCID: PMC10842935
- DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003386
Tracheal Intubation by Advanced Practice Registered Nurses in Pediatric Critical Care: Retrospective Study From the National Emergency Airway for Children Registry (2015-2019)
Abstract
Objectives: To describe tracheal intubation (TI) practice by Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) in North American PICUs, including rates of TI-associated events (TIAEs) from 2015 to 2019.
Design/setting: Retrospective study using the National Emergency Airway Registry for Children with all TIs performed in PICU and pediatric cardiac ICU between January 2015 and December 2019. The primary outcome was first attempt TI success rate. Secondary outcomes were TIAEs, severe TIAEs, and hypoxemia.
Subjects: Critically ill children requiring TI in a PICU or pediatric cardiac ICU.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Among 11,012 TIs, APRNs performed 1,626 (14.7%). Overall, TI by APRNs, compared with other clinicians, occurred less frequently in patients with known difficult airway (11.1% vs. 14.3%; p < 0.001), but more frequently in infants younger than 1 year old (55.9% vs. 44.4%; p < 0.0001), and in patients with cardiac disease (26.3% vs. 15.9%; p < 0.0001).There was lower odds of success in first attempt TI for APRNs vs. other clinicians (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.79). We failed to identify a difference in rates of TIAE, severe TIAE, and oxygen desaturation events for TIs by APRNs compared with other clinicians. The TI first attempt success rate improved with APRN experience (< 1 yr: 54.2%, 1-5 yr: 59.4%, 6-10 yr: 67.6%, > 10 yr: 63.1%; p = 0.021).
Conclusions: TI performed by APRNs was associated with lower odds of first attempt success when compared with other ICU clinicians although there was no appreciable difference in procedural adverse events. There appears to be a positive relationship between experience and success rates. These data suggest there is an ongoing need for opportunities to build on TI competency with APRNs.
Copyright © 2023 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Polikoff received funding from Novavax. Drs. Napolitano’s and Shults’s institutions received funding from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (R18HS024511). Dr. Napolitano’s institution received funding from Drager, Timpel, Respironics, Actuated Medical, and Vero-Biotech. Dr. Shults received support for article research from the AHRQ (R18HS024511). Dr. Berkenbosch received funding from Pfizer. Dr. Nishisaki’s institution received funding from the AHRQ, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and Chiesi USA; she received support for article research from the AHRQ. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Pacini C, Bishop M, Bowman G, et al.: AACN’s Vision for Academic Nursing White Paper. Available at: https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/0/PDFs/White-Papers/Vision-Academic-... Accessed Aug 7, 2023
-
- National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners: NAPNAP Position Statement on Access to Care. J Pediatr Health Care 2022; 26:388–391
-
- Maymi M, Madded M, Bauer C, Reuter-Rice K: Acute Care Pediatric Nurse Practitioner: The 2018 Practice Analysis. J Pediatr Health Care 2022; 36:e11–e21 - PubMed
-
- Gigli KH, Beauchesne MA, Dirks MS, Peck JL: White Paper: Critical Shortage of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners Predicted. J Pediatr Health Care 2019, 33:347–355 - PubMed
-
- Kleinpell RM, Ely EW, Grabenkort R: Nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the intensive care unit: an evidence-based review. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:2888–2897 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
