Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;39(12):2567-2574.
doi: 10.1007/s10554-023-02967-y. Epub 2023 Oct 26.

Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in comparison to non-hyperemic pressure ratios: a prospective study

Affiliations

Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in comparison to non-hyperemic pressure ratios: a prospective study

Catherine Liontou et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a new angiography-based coronary physiology tool aimed to evaluate functional relevance of intermediate coronary lesions. Aim of the study is to assess diagnostic performance of QFR in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) in comparison to currently used non-hyperaemic pressure ratios (NHPRs). In this prospective, single-centre study, coronary physiology of intermediate coronary stenoses of non-culprit vessels in patients presenting with NSTE-ACS was evaluated using NHPRs (iFR, DFR or RFR). Subsequently, QFR was computed offline by a QFR analyst blinded to the NHPR results. Diagnostic performance of QFR was assessed in comparison to NHPRs as reference standard. A total of 60 vessels with intermediate coronary stenoses was investigated. The NHPRs were used as follows: RFR 38%, DFR 47% and iFR 15% of the cases. The NHPR result was positive, showing significant lesion, in 19 cases. A significant correlation was found between NHPR and QFR (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). Classification agreement of the two methods (95%) and diagnostic performance of QFR in comparison to NHPR (AUC: 0.962 [0.914-1.00]) were both high. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of QFR in comparison to NHPR were 84.2%, 100%, 100% and 93.2% respectively. QFR has high diagnostic performance in detecting functionally significant lesions of non-culprit arteries in patients with NSTE-ACS and multivessel disease. Due to its high negative predictive value, it can be used to safely avoid unnecessary invasive physiological assessment of these lesions.

Keywords: Coronary physiology; NSTE-ACS; Non-hyperaemic pressure ratio; Quantitative flow ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Zimmermann FM, Ferrara A, Johnson NP et al (2015) Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial. Eur Heart J 36:3182–3188 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Fearon WF (2014) Percutaneous coronary intervention should be guided by fractional flow reserve measurement. Circulation 129:1860–1870 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A et al (2019) 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 40:87–165 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Smits PC, Abdel-Wahab M, Neumann F-J et al (2017) Fractional flow reserve–guided multivessel angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 376:1234–1244 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Sels JWEM, Tonino PAL, Siebert U et al (2011) Fractional flow reserve in unstable angina and non- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: experience from the FAME (fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation) study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4:1183–1189 - PubMed - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources