Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov-Dec;51(9):1589-1595.
doi: 10.1002/jcu.23587. Epub 2023 Oct 26.

False-positive supraclavicular lymph node detected on chest computed tomography in oncology patients: Clinical implication based on subsequent neck ultrasonography and ultrasonography-guided tissue sampling

Affiliations

False-positive supraclavicular lymph node detected on chest computed tomography in oncology patients: Clinical implication based on subsequent neck ultrasonography and ultrasonography-guided tissue sampling

Yujin Jeong et al. J Clin Ultrasound. 2023 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and clinical implications of false-positive supraclavicular lymph node (LN) detected on chest computed tomography (CT), using subsequent neck ultrasonography (US) and US-guided tissue sampling.

Methods: Among 172 patients with suspected supraclavicular LNs identified on CT, 87 underwent neck US or US-guided tissue sampling. Receiver operating characteristic curve and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the diagnostic performance of US and independent predictors of false-positive LNs.

Results: Among 87 patients, 49 (56.3%) were pathologically confirmed as metastases, 26 (29.9%) were negative for malignancy, and 12 (13.8%) had pseudolesions or schwannomas. The diagnostic indices were as follows: sensitivity, 91.8%; specificity, 92.3%; PPV, 95.7%; NPV, 85.7%; and accuracy, 92.0% (AUC = 0.921; 95% CI: 0.832-0.970, p < 0.001). The false-positive group had a higher mean age than the true-positive group (mean age, 69.8 ± 9.2 vs. 63.9 ± 9.8, p = 0.003). Logistic regression analyses revealed that age ≥ 65 years was the only independent predictor of false-positive LNs (OR = 4.391; 95% CI: 1.037-18.582; p = 0.044).

Conclusion: Subsequent US can be helpful for evaluating suspicious supraclavicular LNs detected on CT to establish appropriate management, especially in older patients.

Keywords: computed tomography; metastasis; supraclavicular lymph node; ultrasonography; ultrasonography-guided tissue sampling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

REFERENCES

    1. Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. Springer; 2017.
    1. Fultz PJ, Harrow AR, Elvey SP, et al. Sonographically guided biopsy of supraclavicular lymph nodes: a simple alternative to lung biopsy and other more invasive procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1403-1409.
    1. van Overhagen H, Laméris JS, Berger MY, et al. Supraclavicular lymph node metastases in carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: assessment with CT, US, and US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology. 1991;179:155-158.
    1. Fultz PJ, Feins RH, Strang JG, et al. Detection and diagnosis of nonpalpable supraclavicular lymph nodes in lung cancer at CT and US. Radiology. 2002;222:245-251.
    1. Vassallo P, Wernecke K, Roos N, Peters PE. Differentiation of benign from malignant superficial lymphadenopathy: the role of high-resolution US. Radiology. 1992;183:215-220.