False-positive supraclavicular lymph node detected on chest computed tomography in oncology patients: Clinical implication based on subsequent neck ultrasonography and ultrasonography-guided tissue sampling
- PMID: 37883105
- DOI: 10.1002/jcu.23587
False-positive supraclavicular lymph node detected on chest computed tomography in oncology patients: Clinical implication based on subsequent neck ultrasonography and ultrasonography-guided tissue sampling
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and clinical implications of false-positive supraclavicular lymph node (LN) detected on chest computed tomography (CT), using subsequent neck ultrasonography (US) and US-guided tissue sampling.
Methods: Among 172 patients with suspected supraclavicular LNs identified on CT, 87 underwent neck US or US-guided tissue sampling. Receiver operating characteristic curve and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the diagnostic performance of US and independent predictors of false-positive LNs.
Results: Among 87 patients, 49 (56.3%) were pathologically confirmed as metastases, 26 (29.9%) were negative for malignancy, and 12 (13.8%) had pseudolesions or schwannomas. The diagnostic indices were as follows: sensitivity, 91.8%; specificity, 92.3%; PPV, 95.7%; NPV, 85.7%; and accuracy, 92.0% (AUC = 0.921; 95% CI: 0.832-0.970, p < 0.001). The false-positive group had a higher mean age than the true-positive group (mean age, 69.8 ± 9.2 vs. 63.9 ± 9.8, p = 0.003). Logistic regression analyses revealed that age ≥ 65 years was the only independent predictor of false-positive LNs (OR = 4.391; 95% CI: 1.037-18.582; p = 0.044).
Conclusion: Subsequent US can be helpful for evaluating suspicious supraclavicular LNs detected on CT to establish appropriate management, especially in older patients.
Keywords: computed tomography; metastasis; supraclavicular lymph node; ultrasonography; ultrasonography-guided tissue sampling.
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Comment in
-
Diagnostic dilemma of the supraclavicular lymph node in oncology.J Clin Ultrasound. 2023 Nov-Dec;51(9):1596-1597. doi: 10.1002/jcu.23595. Epub 2023 Nov 8. J Clin Ultrasound. 2023. PMID: 37941502 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. Springer; 2017.
-
- Fultz PJ, Harrow AR, Elvey SP, et al. Sonographically guided biopsy of supraclavicular lymph nodes: a simple alternative to lung biopsy and other more invasive procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1403-1409.
-
- van Overhagen H, Laméris JS, Berger MY, et al. Supraclavicular lymph node metastases in carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: assessment with CT, US, and US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology. 1991;179:155-158.
-
- Fultz PJ, Feins RH, Strang JG, et al. Detection and diagnosis of nonpalpable supraclavicular lymph nodes in lung cancer at CT and US. Radiology. 2002;222:245-251.
-
- Vassallo P, Wernecke K, Roos N, Peters PE. Differentiation of benign from malignant superficial lymphadenopathy: the role of high-resolution US. Radiology. 1992;183:215-220.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical