Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 26;9(1):88.
doi: 10.1038/s41523-023-00594-3.

Tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors with ovarian function suppression in pre-menopausal stage I-III lobular breast cancer

Affiliations

Tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors with ovarian function suppression in pre-menopausal stage I-III lobular breast cancer

Helena Record et al. NPJ Breast Cancer. .

Abstract

While adjuvant treatment with the selective-estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) tamoxifen has been the standard of care for pre-menopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer, recent trials showed a benefit of aromatase inhibitors (AI) and ovarian function suppression (OFS) for some patients. The approach to endocrine therapy has not been well studied in pre-menopausal patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). We identified 202 pre-menopausal patients with HR positive stage I-III ILC in an institutional database. We investigated factors associated with endocrine therapy type and determined changes in systemic therapy from 1990-2021. We evaluated associations between endocrine therapy type and disease-free survival (DFS) with a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Of 202 patients, most (69.3%) were prescribed a SERM (99.3% tamoxifen). Those who received an AI had significantly higher stage disease. Over time, use of OFS and AI increased significantly in stage II or III cases (from 0% in 1990 to 56% after 2015 for stage II; from 0% to 80% after 2015 for stage III). Concurrently, adjuvant chemotherapy use significantly decreased in stage II cases (from 67% to 19%). In an exploratory multivariable model, longer duration of AI compared to tamoxifen was associated with significantly improved DFS (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.11-0.86; p = 0.025). While most pre-menopausal patients received adjuvant tamoxifen, the use of OFS and AIs increased significantly over time. The association between AI use and improved DFS may be consistent with prior randomized trials and warrants further investigation into predictive factors to guide treatment selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A. Jo Chien receives research funding from Merck, Puma, Amgen, and Seattle Genetics. Michelle E. Melisko reports research funding from Astra Zeneca, Novartis, KCRN Research, Puma, and Seattle Genetics. Hope S. Rugo receives research support for clinical trials through UCSF, Pfizer, Merck, Novartis, Lilly, Roche, Daiichi, Seattle Genetics, Macrogenics, Sermonix, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca, Astellas, and Gilead and honoraria from Puma, Samsung, Mylan, Chugai, Blueprint, and NAPO. All other authors have no competing financial or non-financial interests to disclose. R. Mukhtar is supported by the National Cancer Institute Award K08CA256047.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Selection of pre-menopausal patients with HR+ ILC from an institutional database of 835 ILC cases.
A Flow diagram depicting study population selection from an institutional invasive lobular carcinoma database. B Breakdown of type of adjuvant endocrine therapy received throughout treatment. ER estrogen receptor, PR progesterone receptor, SERM selective estrogen receptor modulator, AI aromatase inhibitor, OFS ovarian function suppression.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Adjuvant endocrine therapy treatment patterns across year of diagnosis, stratified by cancer stage.
A Temporal trends in initial type of adjuvant endocrine therapy received (AI vs. SERM). B Temporal trends in use of ovarian function suppression. AI, aromatase inhibitor; SERM, selective estrogen receptor modulator; OFS, ovarian function suppression; N, total number of patients diagnosed within time interval.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Distribution of chemotherapy use across year of diagnosis, stratified by cancer stage.
A Temporal trends in neoadjuvant chemotherapy. B Temporal trends in adjuvant chemotherapy. N, total number of patients diagnosed within time interval.

References

    1. Ferlay J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer. 2015;136:E359–E386. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howlader N, et al. US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2014;106:dju055. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju055. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gradishar WJ, et al. Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. JNCCN. 2022;20:691–722. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2015;386:1341–1352. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61074-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pagani O, et al. Adjuvant exemestane with ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;371:107–118. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404037. - DOI - PMC - PubMed