This is a preprint.
Application of Spatial Analysis for Electronic Health Records: Characterizing Patient Phenotypes and Emerging Trends
- PMID: 37886509
- PMCID: PMC10602163
- DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3443865/v2
Application of Spatial Analysis for Electronic Health Records: Characterizing Patient Phenotypes and Emerging Trends
Update in
-
Application of Spatial Analysis on Electronic Health Records to Characterize Patient Phenotypes: Systematic Review.JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Oct 15;12:e56343. doi: 10.2196/56343. JMIR Med Inform. 2024. PMID: 39405525 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: Electronic health records (EHR) commonly contain patient addresses that provide valuable data for geocoding and spatial analysis, enabling more comprehensive descriptions of individual patients for clinical purposes. Despite the widespread use of EHR in clinical decision support and interventions, no systematic review has examined the extent to which spatial analysis is used to characterize patient phenotypes.
Objective: This study reviews advanced spatial analyses that employed individual-level health data from EHR within the US to characterize patient phenotypes.
Methods: We systematically evaluated English-language peer-reviewed articles from PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases from inception to August 20, 2023, without imposing constraints on time, study design, or specific health domains.
Results: Only 49 articles met the eligibility criteria. These articles utilized diverse spatial methods, with a predominant focus on clustering techniques, while spatiotemporal analysis (frequentist and Bayesian) and modeling were relatively underexplored. A noteworthy surge (n = 42, 85.7%) in publications was observed post-2017. The publications investigated a variety of adult and pediatric clinical areas, including infectious disease, endocrinology, and cardiology, using phenotypes defined over a range of data domains, such as demographics, diagnoses, and visits. The primary health outcomes investigated were asthma, hypertension, and diabetes. Notably, patient phenotypes involving genomics, imaging, and notes were rarely utilized.
Conclusions: This review underscores the growing interest in spatial analysis of EHR-derived data and highlights knowledge gaps in clinical health, phenotype domains, and spatial methodologies. Additionally, this review proposes guidelines for harnessing the potential of spatial analysis to enhance the context of individual patients for future clinical decision support.
Keywords: clinical phenotypes; electronic health records; geocoding; geographic information systems; patient phenotypes; spatial analysis.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest None declared. Additional Declarations: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Kuo A. and Dang S., Secure Messaging in Electronic Health Records and Its Impact on Diabetes Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Telemed J E Health, 2016. 22(9): p. 769–77. - PubMed
-
- Dash S., et al., Big data in healthcare: management, analysis and future prospects. Journal of big data, 2019. 6(1): p. 1–25.
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous