Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Oct 18;11(10):241.
doi: 10.3390/dj11100241.

Accuracy of Intraoral Scanner for Recording Completely Edentulous Arches-A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Accuracy of Intraoral Scanner for Recording Completely Edentulous Arches-A Systematic Review

Gunjan Srivastava et al. Dent J (Basel). .

Abstract

Scanning edentulous arches during complete denture fabrication is a crucial step; however, the quality of the resulting digital scan is still questionable. The purpose of this study is to systematically review studies (both clinical and in vitro) and determine whether intraoral scanners have clinically acceptable accuracy when recording completely edentulous arches for the fabrication of removable complete dentures. An electronic search in medical databases like PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WOS), using a combination of relevant keywords, retrieved 334 articles. After full-text evaluation, twelve articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this review (eight clinical studies and four in vitro studies). A quality analysis of the included studies was carried out using the QUADAS-2 tool. The accuracy values varied between different intraoral scanners. Different regions of the edentulous arches showed differences in trueness and precision values in both in vitro and clinical studies. Peripheral borders, the inner seal, and poorly traceable structures like the soft palate showed maximum discrepancies. The accuracy of intraoral scanners in recording clear anatomic landmarks like hard tissues with attached mucosa was comparable to conventional edentulous arch impressions. However, higher discrepancies were recorded when digitizing mobile and poorly traceable structures. Intraoral scanners can be used to digitize denture-bearing areas, but the interpretation of the peripheral border and the soft palate should be carefully carried out.

Keywords: complete denture; conventional impression; edentulous jaws; intraoral scanner; removable prosthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prisma flowchart for study selection.

References

    1. Jacobson T.E., Krol A.J. A Contemporary Review of the Factors Involved in Complete Denture Retention, Stability, and Support. Part I: Retention. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1983;49:5–15. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90228-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Addison P.I. Application of Mucostatic Principles to Full Denture Construction. N. Y. J. Dent. 1947;17:135–145. - PubMed
    1. Rao S., Chowdhary R., Mahoorkar S. A Systematic Review of Impression Technique for Conventional Complete Denture. J. Indian. Prosthodont. Soc. 2010;10:105–111. doi: 10.1007/s13191-010-0020-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Devan M.M. Basic Principles in Impression Making. 1952. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2005;93:503–508. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.02.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beresin V.E., Schiesser F.J. The Neutral Zone in Complete Dentures. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1976;36:356–367. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(76)90155-4. - DOI - PubMed