Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 10;20(20):6906.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20206906.

QoL, CIs, QALYs, and Individualized Rehabilitation: The Clinical and Practical Benefits of Regularly Assessing the Quality of Life of Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients

Affiliations

QoL, CIs, QALYs, and Individualized Rehabilitation: The Clinical and Practical Benefits of Regularly Assessing the Quality of Life of Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients

Luis Lassaletta et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

This study aimed to report quality of life (QoL) scores in unilateral cochlear implant (CI) users and to generate guidance for clinicians on using QoL measures to individualize CI counselling and rehabilitation and to increase access to CIs as a mode of rehabilitation. Participants (n = 101) were unilateral CI users with single-sided deafness (SSD; n = 17), asymmetrical hearing loss (AHL; n = 26), or bilateral hearing loss (Uni; n = 58). Generic QoL was assessed via the Health Utilities Index (HUI-3), and disease-specific QoL was assessed via the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ12) and Nijmegen CI Questionnaire (NCIQ) at preimplantation and at 6 and 12 months of CI use. All groups had significantly increased HUI-3 scores at both intervals. The SSD group showed significant benefit on the SSQ12 at visit 3, the AHL group showed significant benefit on the SSQ12 and most NCIQ subdomains at both intervals, and the Uni group showed significant benefit with both tests at both intervals. Unilateral CI recipients demonstrate improved QoL within the first 12 months of device use. Regular assessment with generic and disease-specific questionnaires has the potential to play an important role in personalizing treatment and possibly in increasing access to CI provision.

Keywords: asymmetrical hearing loss; cochlear implant; patient reported outcome measure; quality of life; rehabilitation; single-side deafness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Health Utilities Index (HUI-3) scores for each group at each visit. Mean values are depicted as black squares and the medians as horizontal lines. The black circles represent outliers. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (QoL). CI = cochlear implant, SSD = single-sided deafness, AHL = asymmetric hearing loss, Unilateral = unilateral CI user with bilateral deafness.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ12) total scores for each group at each interval. Mean values are depicted as black squares and the medians as horizontal lines. The black circles represent outliers. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (QoL). CI = cochlear implant, SSD = single-sided deafness, AHL = asymmetric hearing loss. Unilateral = unilateral CI user with bilateral deafness.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) scores for each group at each interval. Mean values are depicted as black squares and the medians as horizontal lines. The black circles represent outliers. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (QoL). CI = cochlear implant, SSD = single-sided deafness, AHL = asymmetric hearing loss, Unilateral = unilateral CI user with bilateral deafness.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Hours of daily cochlear implant (CI) use for each group at each postoperative interval. Frequency is in hours per day. SSD = single-sided deafness, AHL = asymmetric hearing loss, Unilateral = unilateral CI user with bilateral deafness.

References

    1. Contrera K.J., Betz J., Li L., Blake C.R., Sung Y.K., Choi J.S., Lin F.R. Quality of life after intervention with a cochlear implant or hearing aid. Laryngoscope. 2016;126:2110–2115. doi: 10.1002/lary.25848. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thompson N.J., Brown K.D., Dillon M.T. Cochlear implantation for paediatric and adult cases of unilateral and asymmetric hearing loss. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2022;30:303–308. doi: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000838. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lassaletta L., Calvino M., Sanchez-Cuadrado I., Skarzynski P.H., Cywka K.B., Czajka N., Kutyba J., Tavora-Vieira D., van de Heyning P., Mertens G., et al. Using Generic and Disease-Specific Measures to Assess Quality of Life before and after 12 Months of Hearing Implant Use: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Multicenter, Observational Clinical Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19:2503. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052503. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weichbold V., Zelger P., Galvan O., Muigg F. 5-Year Observation Period of Quality of Life After Cochlear Implantation. Otol. Neurotol. 2023;44:e155–e159. doi: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003809. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Horsman J., Furlong W., Feeny D., Torrance G. The Health Utilities Index (HUI): Concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual. Life Outcomes. 2003;1:54. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-54. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types