Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 1;13(11):1850.
doi: 10.3390/ani13111850.

The Science and Social Validity of Companion Animal Welfare: Functionally Defined Parameters in a Multidisciplinary Field

Affiliations
Review

The Science and Social Validity of Companion Animal Welfare: Functionally Defined Parameters in a Multidisciplinary Field

Lauren I Novack et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Social validity refers to the social significance and acceptability of intervention goals, procedures, and outcomes. Animal practitioners, who are often guided by the principles of ABA, lack the benefit of verbal participants (at least with respect to target animals) with which to assess a client's needs and preferences. The study of a learner's welfare is useful for determining areas where intervention is needed or how the learner feels about an intervention that is underway. Three tenets of animal welfare measurement include physiological function, naturalistic behavior, and affect, where affect refers to private events, including emotions, which are a function of the same variables and contingencies responsible for controlling public behavior. The development of new technologies allows us to look "under the skin" and account for subjective experiences that can now be observed objectively. We introduce the reader to tools available from the animal welfare sciences for the objective measurement of social validity from the learner's perspective.

Keywords: animal training; behavior analysis; behavior intervention; companion animal; dog; social validity; welfare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Philpotts I., Dillon J., Rooney N. Improving the Welfare of Companion Dogs—Is Owner Education the Solution? Animals. 2019;9:662. doi: 10.3390/ani9090662. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mellor D.J., Beausoleil N.J., Littlewood K.E., McLean A.N., McGreevy P.D., Jones B., Wilkins C. The 2020 Five Domains Model: Including Human–Animal Interactions in Assessments of Animal Welfare. Animals. 2020;10:1870. doi: 10.3390/ani10101870. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yeates J. Quality of life and animal behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;181:19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.04.018. - DOI
    1. Bensky M.K., Gosling S.D., Sinn D.L. The World from a Dog’s Point of View. Adv. Study Behav. 2013;45:209–406. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-407186-5.00005-7. - DOI
    1. Benz-Schwarzburg J., Monsó S., Huber L. How Dogs Perceive Humans and How Humans Should Treat Their Pet Dogs: Linking Cognition with Ethics. Front. Psychol. 2020;11:584037. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584037. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources