A synthesis of recent tools and perspectives in migratory connectivity studies
- PMID: 37891684
- PMCID: PMC10605477
- DOI: 10.1186/s40462-023-00388-z
A synthesis of recent tools and perspectives in migratory connectivity studies
Abstract
Migration movements connect breeding and non-breeding bird populations over the year. Such links, referred to as migratory connectivity, have important implications for migratory population dynamics as they dictate the consequences of localised events for the whole population network. This calls for concerted efforts to understand migration processes for large-scale conservation. Over the last 20 years, the toolbox to investigate connectivity patterns has expanded and studies now consider migratory connectivity over a broader range of species and contexts. Here, we summarise recent developments in analysing migratory connectivity, focusing on strategies and challenges to pooling various types of data to both optimise and broaden the scope of connectivity studies. We find that the different approaches used to investigate migratory connectivity still have complementary strengths and weaknesses, whether in terms of cost, spatial and temporal resolution, or challenges in obtaining large sample sizes or connectivity estimates. Certain recent developments offer particularly promising prospects: robust quantitative models for banding data, improved precision of geolocators and accessibility of telemetry tracking systems, and increasingly precise probabilistic assignments based on genomic markers or large-scale isoscapes. In parallel, studies have proposed various ways to combine the information of different datasets, from simply comparing the connectivity patterns they draw to formally integrating their analyses. Such data combinations have proven to be more accurate in estimating connectivity patterns, particularly for integrated approaches that offer promising flexibility. Given the diversity of available tools, future studies would benefit from a rigorous comparative evaluation of the different methodologies to guide data collection to complete migration atlases: where and when should data be collected during the migratory cycle to best describe connectivity patterns? Which data are most favourable to combine, and under what conditions? Are there methods for combining data that are better than others? Can combination methods be improved by adjusting the contribution of the various data in the models? How can we fully integrate connectivity with demographic and environmental data? Data integration shows strong potential to deepen our understanding of migratory connectivity as a dynamic ecological process, especially if the gaps can be bridged between connectivity, population and environmental models.
Keywords: Data pooling; Integrated modelling; Migration patterns; Movement ecology; Population dynamics; Transition probabilities.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Åkesson S, Helm B. Endogenous programs and flexibility in bird migration. Front Ecol Evol. 2020;8:78. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00078. - DOI
-
- Vickery JA, Ewing SR, Smith KW, Pain DJ, Bairlein F, Škorpilová J, et al. The decline of Afro-Palaearctic migrants and an assessment of potential causes. Ibis. 2014;156(1):1–22. doi: 10.1111/ibi.12118. - DOI
-
- Sanderson FJ, Donald PF, Pain DJ, Burfield IJ, van Bommel FPJ. Long-term population declines in Afro-Palearctic migrant birds. Biol Conserv. 2006;131(1):93–105. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.02.008. - DOI
-
- Sillett TS, Holmes RT. Variation in survivorship of a migratory songbird throughout its annual cycle. J Anim Ecol. 2002;71(2):296–308. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00599.x. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
