Screening for Peripheral Artery Disease Using an Automated Four-Limb Blood Pressure Monitor Equipped with Toe-Brachial Index Measurement
- PMID: 37892678
- PMCID: PMC10607258
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm12206539
Screening for Peripheral Artery Disease Using an Automated Four-Limb Blood Pressure Monitor Equipped with Toe-Brachial Index Measurement
Abstract
Toe-brachial index (TBI) measurement helps to detect peripheral artery disease (PAD) in patients with incompressible ankle arteries due to medial arterial calcification, which is most frequently associated with diabetes. We aimed to evaluate how an automated four-limb blood pressure monitor equipped with TBI measurement could contribute to PAD screening. In 117 patients (mean age 63.2 ± 12.8 years), ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement was performed using the Doppler-method and the MESI mTablet. TBI was obtained via photoplethysmography (MESI mTablet, SysToe) and a laser Doppler fluxmeter (PeriFlux 5000). Lower limb PAD lesions were evaluated based on vascular imaging. A significant correlation was found between Doppler and MESI ankle-brachial index values (r = 0.672), which was stronger in non-diabetic (r = 0.744) than in diabetic (r = 0.562) patients. At an ABI cut-off of 0.9, Doppler (AUC = 0.888) showed a sensitivity/specificity of 67.1%/97.4%, MESI (AUC 0.891) exhibited a sensitivity/specificity of 57.0%/100%; at a cut-off of 1.0, MESI demonstrated a sensitivity/specificity of 74.7%/94.8%. The TBI values measured using the three devices did not differ significantly (p = 0.33). At a TBI cut-off of 0.7, MESI (AUC = 0.909) revealed a sensitivity/specificity of 92.1%/67.5%. Combining MESI ABI and TBI measurements recognised 92.4% of PAD limbs. Using an ABI cut-off level of 1.0 and sequential TBI measurement increases the sensitivity of the device in detecting PAD. The precise interpretation of the obtained results requires some expertise.
Keywords: ankle–brachial index; oscillometry; peripheral artery disease; photoplethysmography; screening; toe–brachial index.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Fowkes F.G., Rudan D., Rudan I., Aboyans V., Denenberg J.O., McDermott M.M., Norman P.E., Sampson U.K., Williams L.J., Mensah G.A., et al. Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: A systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013;382:1329–1340. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61249-0. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Song P., Rudan D., Zhu Y., Fowkes F.J.I., Rahimi K., Fowkes F.G.R., Rudan I. Global, regional, and national prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2015: An updated systematic review and analysis. Lancet Glob. Health. 2019;7:e1020–e1030. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30255-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Aboyans V., Ricco J.B., Bartelink M.E.L., Björck M., Brodmann M., Cohnert T., Collet J.P., Czerny M., De Carlo M., Debus S., et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries. Endorsed by: The European Stroke Organization (ESO). The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) Eur. Heart J. 2018;39:763–816. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx095. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hirsch A.T., Criqui M.H., Treat-Jacobson D., Regensteiner J.G., Creager M.A., Olin J.W., Krook S.H., Hunninghake D.B., Comerota A.J., Walsh M.E., et al. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA. 2001;286:1317–1324. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.11.1317. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
