Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Oct 18;11(10):2818.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11102818.

Direct Detection of Lyme Borrelia: Recent Advancement and Use of Aptamer Technology

Affiliations
Review

Direct Detection of Lyme Borrelia: Recent Advancement and Use of Aptamer Technology

Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Kamarudin et al. Biomedicines. .

Abstract

Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (B. burgdorferi s.l.), which is predominantly spread by ticks, is the cause of Lyme disease (LD), also known as Lyme borreliosis, one of the zoonotic diseases affecting people. In recent years, LD has become more prevalent worldwide, even in countries with no prior records. Currently, Lyme Borrelia detection is achieved through nucleic acid amplification, antigen detection, microscopy, and in vitro culture. Nevertheless, these methods lack sensitivity in the early phase of the disease and, thus, are unable to confirm active infection. This review briefly discusses the existing direct detection methods of LD. Furthermore, this review also introduces the use of aptamer technology integrated with biosensor platforms to detect the Borrelia antigen. This aptamer technology could be explored using other biosensor platforms targeting whole Borrelia cells or specific molecules to enhance Borrelia detection in the future.

Keywords: Lyme disease; aptamer; biosensor; direct detection; tick-borne disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Differences between STTT and MTTT: Two-tier testing methods for LD diagnosis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Direct detection method of Borrelia using isolated genetic material and soluble antigen in various samples. The biosensor detection diagram was modified from [54], which is open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Steere A.C., Strle F., Wormser G.P., Hu L.T., Branda J.A., Hovius J.W., Li X., Mead P.S. Lyme borreliosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2016;2:16090. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.90. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ivanova L., Christova I., Neves V., Aroso M., Meirelles L., Brisson D., Gomes-Solecki M. Comprehensive seroprofiling of sixteen B. burgdorferi OspC: Implications for Lyme disease diagnostics design. Clin. Immunol. 2009;132:393–400. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2009.05.017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baranton G., Seinost G., Theodore G., Postic D., Dykhuizen D. Distinct levels of genetic diversity of Borrelia burgdorferi are associated with different aspects of pathogenicity. Res. Microbiol. 2001;152:149–156. doi: 10.1016/S0923-2508(01)01186-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stanek G., Strle F. Lyme borreliosis–from tick bite to diagnosis and treatment. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018;42:233–258. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux047. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shapiro E.D., Gerber M.A. Lyme Disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000;31:533–542. doi: 10.1086/313982. - DOI - PubMed