Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1979 Jun;138(3):739-47.
doi: 10.1128/jb.138.3.739-747.1979.

Relation of chemotactic response to the amount of receptor: evidence for different efficiencies of signal transduction

Relation of chemotactic response to the amount of receptor: evidence for different efficiencies of signal transduction

A Koman et al. J Bacteriol. 1979 Jun.

Abstract

We determined the content of galactose-glucose-, maltose-, and ribose-binding proteins in cells of Escherichia coli K-12 grown in a variety of media and also measured the respective transport and chemotactic activities that depend on those binding proteins. Correlation of the level of induction of a particular binding protein with the extent of tactic activity mediated by that protein indicates that the magnitude of the tactic response to a particular stimulating compound is a direct function of the number of receptors per cell. In contrast, comparison of the magnitudes of response to substances recognized by independent receptors indicates that some stimulus-receptor complexes are more effective in eliciting tactic responses than are others. Thus, the magnitude of response to any particular stimulating compound is a function both of the number of receptors per cell and of the effectiveness of the stimulus-receptor complex. Considerations of available information about the tactic response to maltose suggest that the effectiveness of a stimulus-receptor complex is related to the transducer with which the receptor interacts. The tar product appears to be a relatively effective transducer of the signals it accepts from receptors for aspartate, alpha-methylaspartate, and maltose, whereas the trg product appears to be a relatively ineffective transducer of signals it accepts from receptors for galactose and ribose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265-75 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Biochem. 1977 May 2;75(1):43-53 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):260-4 - PubMed
    1. Mol Gen Genet. 1979 Mar 20;171(2):193-203 - PubMed
    1. Cell. 1979 Mar;16(3):617-25 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources