Biodeterioration and Chemical Corrosion of Concrete in the Marine Environment: Too Complex for Prediction
- PMID: 37894096
- PMCID: PMC10609443
- DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102438
Biodeterioration and Chemical Corrosion of Concrete in the Marine Environment: Too Complex for Prediction
Abstract
Concrete is the most utilized construction material worldwide. In the marine environment, it is subject to chemical degradation through reactions with chloride (the most important ion), and sulfate and magnesium ions in seawater, and to biodeterioration resulting from biological (initially microbiological) activities, principally acid production. These two types of corrosions are reviewed and the failure of attempts to predict the degree of deterioration resulting from each is noted. Chemical (abiotic) corrosion is greatest in the splash zone of coastal constructions, while phenomenological evidence suggests that biodeterioration is greatest in tidal zones. There have been no comparative experiments to determine the rates and types of microbial biofilm formation in these zones. Both chemical and microbiological concrete deteriorations are complex and have not been successfully modeled. The interaction between abiotic corrosion and biofilm formation is considered. EPS can maintain surface hydration, potentially reducing abiotic corrosion. The early marine biofilm contains relatively specific bacterial colonizers, including cyanobacteria and proteobacteria; these change over time, producing a generic concrete biofilm, but the adhesion of microorganisms to concrete in the oceans has been little investigated. The colonization of artificial reefs is briefly discussed. Concrete appears to be a relatively prescriptive substrate, with modifications necessary to increase colonization for the required goal of increasing biological diversity.
Keywords: biofilm; colonization; degradation; extracellular polymeric materials (EPS); intertidal and splash zones; microorganisms; subtidal.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Scrivener K.L., Snellings R. The rise of Portland cements. Elements. 2022;18:308–313. doi: 10.2138/gselements.18.5.308. - DOI
-
- Jahren P., Sui T. History of Concrete: A Very Old and Modern Material. World Scientific; Singapore: 2017. - DOI
-
- Monteiro P.J., Kirchheim A.P., Chae S., Fischer P., MacDowell A.A., Schaible E., Wenk H.R. Characterizing the nano and micro structure of concrete to improve its durability. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2009;31:577–584. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.12.007. - DOI
-
- Wenk H.R., Lutterotti L., Vogel S. Texture analysis with the new HIPPO TOF diffractometer. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 2003;515:575–588. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2003.05.001. - DOI
-
- Han X., Wang B., Feng J. Relationship between fractal feature and compressive strength of concrete based on MIP. Construct Build Mats. 2022;322:126504. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126504. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
