Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 13;15(20):4980.
doi: 10.3390/cancers15204980.

89Zr-Trastuzumab PET/CT Imaging of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer for Predicting Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Feasibility Study

Affiliations

89Zr-Trastuzumab PET/CT Imaging of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer for Predicting Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Feasibility Study

D G J Linders et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Approximately 20% of invasive ductal breast malignancies are human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive. These patients receive neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAT) including HER2-targeting therapies. Up to 65% of patients achieve a pathological complete response (pCR). These patients might not have needed surgery. However, accurate preoperative identification of a pCR remains challenging. A radiologic complete response (rCR) on MRI corresponds to a pCR in only 73% of patients. The current feasibility study investigates if HER2-targeted PET/CT-imaging using Zirconium-89 (89Zr)-radiolabeled trastuzumab can be used for more accurate NAT response evaluation.

Methods: HER2-positive breast cancer patients scheduled to undergo NAT and subsequent surgery received a 89Zr-trastuzumab PET/CT both before (PET/CT-1) and after (PET/CT-2) NAT. Qualitative and quantitative response evaluation was performed.

Results: Six patients were enrolled. All primary tumors could be identified on PET/CT-1. Four patients had a pCR and two a pathological partial response (pPR) in the primary tumor. Qualitative assessment of PET/CT resulted in an accuracy of 66.7%, compared to 83.3% of the standard-of-care MRI. Quantitative assessment showed a difference between the SUVR on PET/CT-1 and PET/CT-2 (ΔSUVR) in patients with a pPR and pCR of -48% and -90% (p = 0.133), respectively. The difference in tumor-to-blood ratio on PET/CT-1 and PET/CT-2 (ΔTBR) in patients with pPR and pCR was -79% and -94% (p = 0.133), respectively. Three patients had metastatic lymph nodes at diagnosis that were all identified on PET/CT-1. All three patients achieved a nodal pCR. Qualitative assessment of the lymph nodes with PET/CT resulted in an accuracy of 66.7%, compared to 50% of the MRI.

Conclusions: NAT response evaluation using 89Zr-trastuzumab PET/CT is feasible. In the current study, qualitative assessment of the PET/CT images is not superior to standard-of-care MRI. Our results suggest that quantitative assessment of 89Zr-trastuzumab PET/CT has potential for a more accurate response evaluation of the primary tumor after NAT in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Keywords: HER2-targeted PET/CT; breast cancer; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; neoadjuvant therapy; surgery-free treatment strategy; treatment response evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagnostic MRI- and 89Zr-trastuzumab-PET/CT images pre- and post-NAT correlated to histopathology in the resected primary tumor. Shown here are three subjects, two with a pCR and one with a pPR. MRI-1 and PET/CT-1 localized all breast cancer lesions accurately. MRI-2 accurately specified these three patients for complete/partial response. Qualitative assessment of PET/CT-2 accurately identified the two patients with a pCR. As shown in the right panel, qualitative assessment of PET/CT-2 classified the subject with a pPR incorrectly as a pCR, and therefore is a false negative. Of note, the SUVR% in this patient (−57%) is considerably lower compared to the two patients with a pCR (−91% and −83%). Shown in the lower panels are the hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of the resected specimen, as well as HER2 staining on, respectively, the diagnostic biopsy (Subject 1 and 2) and the resected primary tumor specimen containing residual tumor (Subject 3). * Patient with bilateral lesion; left: invasive carcinoma; right: ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Created with Biorender.com. Abbreviations: H&E, hematoxylin and eosin staining; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NAT, neoadjuvant systemic therapy; pCR, pathological complete response; pPR, pathological partial response; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio; TBR, tumor-to-blood ratio.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagnostic MRI- and 89Zr-trastuzumab-PET/CT images pre- and post-NAT correlated to histopathology in the resected sentinel lymph node. Shown here are two subjects, both with a nodal pCR. Pre-NAT MRI and 89Zr-trastuzumab-PET/CT localized the tumor positive lymph nodes accurately. Post-NAT MRI accurately specified both patients for complete response. Post-NAT 89Zr-trastuzumab-PET/CT accurately specified one of the two patients with a pCR. As shown in the right panel, 89Zr-trastuzumab-PET/CT classified one subject with a pCR incorrectly as a pPR, and therefore is classified as False Positive. Created with Biorender.com. Abbreviations: H&E, hematoxylin and eosin staining; MRI, Magnetic Resonance Imaging; NAT, neoadjuvant systemic therapy; pCR, pathological complete response; pPR, pathological partial response; SUVmax, Maximum Standardized Uptake Value.

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Veronesi U., Cascinelli N., Mariani L., Greco M., Saccozzi R., Luini A., Aguilar M., Marubini E. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;347:1227–1232. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020989. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arvold N.D., Taghian A.G., Niemierko A., Abi Raad R.F., Sreedhara M., Nguyen P.L., Bellon J.R., Wong J.S., Smith B.L., Harris J.R. Age, breast cancer subtype approximation, and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29:3885–3891. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.1105. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Waks A.G., Winer E.P. Breast Cancer Treatment: A Review. JAMA. 2019;321:288–300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19323. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Korde L.A., Somerfield M.R., Carey L.A., Crews J.R., Denduluri N., Hwang E.S., Khan S.A., Loibl S., Morris E.A., Perez A., et al. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Endocrine Therapy, and Targeted Therapy for Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021;39:1485–1505. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03399. - DOI - PMC - PubMed