Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 18;378(1892):20220351.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0351. Epub 2023 Oct 30.

Light pollution in complex ecological systems

Affiliations

Light pollution in complex ecological systems

Myriam R Hirt et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Light pollution has emerged as a burgeoning area of scientific interest, receiving increasing attention in recent years. The resulting body of literature has revealed a diverse array of species-specific and context-dependent responses to artificial light at night (ALAN). Because predicting and generalizing community-level effects is difficult, our current comprehension of the ecological impacts of light pollution on complex ecological systems remains notably limited. It is critical to better understand ALAN's effects at higher levels of ecological organization in order to comprehend and mitigate the repercussions of ALAN on ecosystem functioning and stability amidst ongoing global change. This theme issue seeks to explore the effects of light pollution on complex ecological systems, by bridging various realms and scaling up from individual processes and functions to communities and networks. Through this integrated approach, this collection aims to shed light on the intricate interplay between light pollution, ecological dynamics and humans in a world increasingly impacted by anthropogenic lighting. This article is part of the theme issue 'Light pollution in complex ecological systems'.

Keywords: artificial light at night; community; ecosystem; global change; modelling; network.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This theme issue was put together by the Guest Editor team under supervision from the journal's Editorial staff, following the Royal Society's ethical codes and best-practice guidelines. The Guest Editor team invited contributions and handled the review process. Individual Guest Editors were not involved in assessing papers where they had a personal, professional or financial conflict of interest with the authors or the research described. Independent reviewers assessed all papers. Invitation to contribute did not guarantee inclusion.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The properties of light. Artificial light possesses several physical characteristics that are crucial to understanding its impact on ecosystems, as well as to formulating informed mitigation strategies. These characteristics include: (i) spectral composition (which can have varying effects on species and ecosystems), (ii) duration and timing (e.g. the lengths of illumination periods during the night, or the precise timing of illumination), (iii) intensity (i.e. amount of light), and (iv) scattering. Light tends to become more scattered through processes such as reflection by aerosols, which typically decreases its intensity. This phenomenon is most prominent in the so-called ‘skyglow’. Images for ‘spectrum’, ‘intensity’ and ‘duration and timing’ ©pixabay. Image for ‘scattering’ ©Alessandro Della Bella. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Effects of ALAN on complex ecological systems. ALAN propagates through different levels of ecological organization. Influencing individual physiology and behaviour, it alters key ecological processes and functions, such as movement or growth, resulting in significant changes to species interactions and the complex networks they form within and across communities. Consequently, the effects of ALAN cascade to entire ecosystems, leading to profound implications for ecosystem functioning. Humans as the cause of light pollution are inherently woven into the intricate web of these impacts. While they gain direct benefits from nocturnal illumination, they also experience negative consequences either directly through, e.g. health issues, or indirectly through a chain of ecosystem feedback effects that could potentially lead to a reduction in ecosystem services. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Modelling and predicting consequences of light pollution. (a) Studies that employ only two (e.g. presence/absence) or too few light levels (i) are at risk of misinterpreting the true impact of light and (ii) limit our ability to make predictions. In the example depicted here, light intensity is thought to have a saturating effect on a certain ecosystem process or function. However, experiment A (in yellow) would fail to capture any significant effect of ALAN, while experiment B (in pink) would overlook the saturating trend. Therefore, it is essential to select an adequate number of light levels to accurately capture the complex relationships between light and organisms (b). The insights gained from fully quantitative (e.g. dose–response) relationships provide the basis to formulating theories and developing models. These models can then be employed to better predict the consequences of ALAN across various dimensions: space, time and different levels of ecological organization (c). Image for ‘space’ from Falchi et al. 2016 [33]. Image for ‘ecological organization’ ©Phillip Janta. Images for ‘time’ ©pixabay. (Online version in colour.)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lüttge U, Hertel B. 2009. Diurnal and annual rhythms in trees. Trees 23, 683-700. (10.1007/s00468-009-0324-1) - DOI
    1. Harrison PL, Babcock RC, Bull GD, Oliver JK, Wallace CC, Willis BL. 1984. Mass spawning in tropical reef corals. Science 223, 1186-1189. (10.1126/science.223.4641.1186) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Babcock RC, Bull GD, Harrison PL, Heyward AJ, Oliver JK, Wallace CC, Willis BL. 1986. Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar. Biol. 90, 379-394. (10.1007/BF00428562) - DOI
    1. Boch CA, Ananthasubramaniam B, Sweeney AM, Doyle FJ, Morse DE. 2011. Effects of light dynamics on coral spawning synchrony. Biol. Bull. 220, 161-173. (10.1086/BBLv220n3p161) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dreisig H. 1980. The importance of illumination level in the daily onset of flight activity in nocturnal moths. Physiol. Entomol. 5, 327-342. (10.1111/j.1365-3032.1980.tb00243.x) - DOI

LinkOut - more resources