Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
- PMID: 37899993
- PMCID: PMC10603622
- DOI: 10.1159/000531940
Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Abstract
Background: Multiple myeloma is currently the leading indication for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). A prerequisite for AHCT is mobilization and collection of adequate blood graft to support high-dose therapy. Current mobilization strategies include granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or in combination with chemotherapy most commonly cyclophosphamide (CY). More recently, plerixafor has become into agenda especially in patients who mobilize poorly. In the selection of a mobilization method, several factors should be considered.
Summary: Preplanned collection target is important as G-CSF plus plerixafor is more effective in the mobilization of CD34+ cells than G-CSF alone. On the other hand, CY plus G-CSF is superior to G-CSF only mobilization. Previous therapy and age of the patients are important considerations as G-CSF alone may not be effective enough in patients with risk factors for poor mobilization. These factors include extensive lenalidomide exposure, irradiation to bone marrow-bearing sites, higher age, or a previous mobilization failure. Also, local preferences and experiences as well as the number of apheresis needed are important issues as well as cost-effectiveness considerations. Mobilization method used may have implication for cellular composition of collected grafts, which might have an impact on posttransplant events such as hematologic and immune recovery in addition to also potential long-term outcomes.
Key message: Currently, G-CSF alone and preemptive plerixafor if needed might be considered as a standard mobilization strategy in MM patients intended for AHCT.
Keywords: CD34+ cells; Graft composition; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; Mobilization of blood grafts; Multiple myeloma; Plerixafor.
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Conflict of interest statement
A.P. reports honoraria from Behring and AbbVie and has participated in Scientific Advisory Board meetings organized by AbbVie, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, and Takeda. V.V. reports consultancy fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, and Sanofi. R.S. has received Janssen-Cilag Research Funding for FMG-MM01 study, Celgene Research Funding for FMG-MM02 study, Celgene/BMS and Takeda Research Funding for NMSG#23/15 study, and Amgen and BMS Research Funding and compensation as a member of the Scientific Advisory Boards organized by Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, and Takeda and consultancy fees from Amgen, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, and Sanofi. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Plerixafor: A chemokine receptor-4 antagonist for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma.Clin Ther. 2010 May;32(5):821-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.05.007. Clin Ther. 2010. PMID: 20685493 Review.
-
Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and low peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count: results of a subset analysis of a randomized trial.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Oct;18(10):1564-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 6. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012. PMID: 22683613 Clinical Trial.
-
Plerixafor: a review of its use in stem-cell mobilization in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma.Drugs. 2011 Aug 20;71(12):1623-47. doi: 10.2165/11206040-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2011. PMID: 21861545 Review.
-
Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.Transfusion. 2011 Sep;51(9):1995-2000. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03085.x. Epub 2011 Mar 10. Transfusion. 2011. PMID: 21392017
-
Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients treat in the novel therapy-era with plerixafor and G-CSF has superior efficacy but significantly higher costs compared to mobilization with low-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF.J Clin Apher. 2013 Oct;28(5):359-67. doi: 10.1002/jca.21280. Epub 2013 Jun 14. J Clin Apher. 2013. PMID: 23765597
Cited by
-
Characteristics and outcomes of therapy-related acute leukemia following autologous transplant (Auto-HCT) for multiple myeloma.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2025 Jan;60(1):64-68. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02455-4. Epub 2024 Oct 30. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2025. PMID: 39478188 Free PMC article.
-
Advances in adoptive cellular immunotherapy and therapeutic breakthroughs in multiple myeloma.Exp Hematol Oncol. 2024 Oct 28;13(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s40164-024-00576-6. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39468695 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Formulation and In Vitro Characterization of Granulocyte-Colony-Stimulating-Factor-Loaded Liposomes: Future Prospective in Reproductive Medicine.Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 17;26(6):2689. doi: 10.3390/ijms26062689. Int J Mol Sci. 2025. PMID: 40141331 Free PMC article.
-
Stem Cell Mobilization, Collection, and Processing.Transfus Med Hemother. 2023 Sep 5;50(5):369-370. doi: 10.1159/000533649. eCollection 2023 Oct. Transfus Med Hemother. 2023. PMID: 37899995 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Passweg J, Baldomero H, Chabannon C, Basak GW, de la Cámara R, Corbacioglu S, et al. . Hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapy survey of the EBMT: monitoring of activities and trends over 30 years. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021;56(7):1651–64. 10.1038/s41409-021-01227-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources