Clinically representative therapy for Nordic adult outpatients with common mental health problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 37902112
- DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12976
Clinically representative therapy for Nordic adult outpatients with common mental health problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
There is a knowledge gap regarding clinically representative therapy given in routine settings, that is treatment as usual (TAU), for patients with common mental health problems (CMHP). This review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate what characterizes clinically representative therapy in Nordic routine clinics and meta-analyze the outcome of such treatment. Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and SveMed+) were searched for TAU, CMHP, and Nordic countries, together with backward and forward search in Scopus (7 November 2022). Studies were either randomized controlled trials (RCT) or open trials, using prospective study designs, examining heterogeneous outpatient groups in routine treatment. Within- and between-group effect sizes (ES), using random effects model, and moderator analyses were calculated. Eleven studies (n = 1,413), demonstrated a small to moderate within-group ES with high heterogeneity (g = 0.49, I2 = 90%). ESs in RCTs were significantly smaller than in open trials. TAU had a marginally smaller ES (g = -0.21; adjusted for publication bias g = -0.06) compared to a broad set of clinical interventions. Clinically representative therapy in the Nordic countries demonstrated a wide variety of characteristics and also a marginally lower ES compared to other interventions. The ESs were smaller than other meta-analyses examining evidence-based treatments in routine treatment.
Keywords: Clinically representative treatment; care as usual; common mental health problems; meta-analysis; treatment as usual (TAU).
© 2023 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology published by Scandinavian Psychological Associations and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- *Arvidsdotter, T., Marklund, B., & Taft, C. (2014). Six-month effects of integrative treatment, therapeutic acupuncture and conventional treatment in alleviating psychological distress in primary care patients - follow up from an open, pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 14, 210.
-
- Bear, H.A., Edbrooke-Childs, J., Norton, S., Krause, K.R. & Wolpert, M. (2020). Systematic review and meta-analysis: Outcomes of routine specialist mental health care for young people with depression and/or anxiety. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 59(7), 810-841.
-
- Bergmark, M., Sundberg, L.R., Markström, U. & Rosenberg, D. (2022). Evidence-based methods in rural areas - knowledge and national guideline utilization in mental health service development. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 19(2), 161-184.
-
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J. & Rothstein, H. (2014). Comprehensive meta-analysis (Version 3.3.070) [Computer software]. Biostat. Retrieved October 3, 2023, from https://www.meta-analysis.com/
-
- *Bratberg, G., Leira, K., Granan, L-P., Jonsbu, E., Fadnes, B. L., Thuland, S. F., & Myklebust, T. Å. (2021). Learning oriented physiotherapy (LOP) in anxiety and depression: An 18 months multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT). European Journal of Physiotherapy, 23(5), 295-304.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous