Quality of patient-reported outcome measures for primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review
- PMID: 37902914
- PMCID: PMC10784326
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03517-8
Quality of patient-reported outcome measures for primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review
Abstract
Purpose: To conduct a systematic review of the quality of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for primary dysmenorrhea (PDys) using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology, and to derive recommendations for use of the PROMs.
Methods: We searched PubMed and Web of Science for studies reporting on the development and/or validation of any PROMs for women with PDys. Applying the COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist, we assessed the methodological quality of each included study. We further evaluated the quality of measurement properties per PROM and study according to the criteria for good measurement properties, and graded the evidence. Based on the overall evidence, we derived recommendations for the use of the included PROMs.
Results: Data from seven studies reporting on four PROMs addressing different outcomes were included. Among those, the Adolescent Dysmenorrhic Self-Care Scale (ADSCS) and the on-menses version of the Dysmenorrhea Symptom Interference Scale (DSI) can be recommended for use. The Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale (ESCAS) and the Dysmenorrhea Daily Diary (DysDD) have the potential to be recommended for use, but require further validation. The off-menses version of the DSI cannot be recommended for use.
Conclusions: The ADSCS can be recommended for the assessment of self-care behavior in PDys. Regarding measures of impact, the on-menses version of the DSI is a suitable tool. Covering the broadest spectrum of outcomes, the DysDD is promising for use in medical care and research, encouraging further investigations. Further validation studies are indicated for all included PROMs.
Keywords: Patient-reported outcome measures; Primary dysmenorrhea; Psychometric properties; Questionnaire.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
CA received consultancy fees from Bionorica SE, Dr Wolff Group, Rheacell, and Sanofi for services related to patient-reported outcome measures. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):760-773. doi: 10.1111/bju.14368. Epub 2018 Jun 8. BJU Int. 2018. PMID: 29726085 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-reported outcome measures for post-COVID-19 condition: a systematic review of instruments and measurement properties.BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e084202. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084202. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39806627 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-reported outcome measures for acute rhinosinusitis in adults and children: a systematic review of the quality of existing instruments.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Sep 12;22(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02289-0. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024. PMID: 39267065 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric validation of the dysmenorrhea daily diary (DysDD): a patient-reported outcome for dysmenorrhea.Qual Life Res. 2017 Aug;26(8):2041-2055. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1562-0. Epub 2017 Apr 12. Qual Life Res. 2017. PMID: 28405780 Clinical Trial.
-
Patient-reported outcome measures for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women: a systematic review.Qual Life Res. 2023 Aug;32(8):2137-2153. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03358-5. Epub 2023 Feb 16. Qual Life Res. 2023. PMID: 36795285 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
New evidence for content validity of the German version of the Acute Cystitis Symptom Score: cognitive interview study among patients and experts.World J Urol. 2025 Jan 25;43(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05406-2. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40085224 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on pain intensity of primary dysmenorrhoea: protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 6;15(7):e089282. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089282. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40623753 Free PMC article.
-
A COSMIN systematic review of generic patient-reported outcome measures in Switzerland.Qual Life Res. 2025 Jul;34(7):1869-1884. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03942-x. Epub 2025 Apr 7. Qual Life Res. 2025. PMID: 40195198 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical