Predictors of static and dynamic balance control in kidney transplant recipients
- PMID: 37904031
- DOI: 10.1007/s00508-023-02292-3
Predictors of static and dynamic balance control in kidney transplant recipients
Abstract
Background: We aimed to evaluate balance control and lower extremity muscle strength in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) including a comparison to a healthy control group and determine the predictors of static and dynamic balance control after kidney transplantation.
Methods: In this study 40 KTRs and 40 healthy controls were included. Balance control was assessed using the Biodex balance system. The static postural stability test (SPST) and clinical test of sensory integration and balance (CTSIB) were used to assess static balance control whereas the dynamic postural stability test (DPST) and limits of stability test (LOST) were used for dynamic balance control. Lower extremity muscle strength was measured with a hand-held dynamometer. Renal functions and laboratory findings of KTRs were recorded.
Results: All the stability index scores of SPST and sway index in CTSIB were significantly higher in KTRs compared to healthy controls. The right anteroposterior stability index score in DPST and the reaction time in LOST were significantly higher whereas overall score in LOST and lower extremity muscle strength were significantly lower in KTRs. The linear regression analysis revealed that hemoglobin was the predictor of static balance control accounting for 11% of the variance and body weight was the predictor of dynamic balance control accounting for 34% of the variance.
Conclusion: Balance control, both static and dynamic, are impaired in KTRs as well as lower extremity muscle strength. Hemoglobin level is a predictor of static balance control whereas body weight is a predictor of dynamic balance control after kidney transplantation.
Keywords: Body weight; Hemoglobin; Kidney transplantation; Muscle strength; Postural control.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: H.N. Bozkurt, M. Yıldırım, A. Çelik and S. Yıldız declare that they have no competing interests. Ethical standards: The study was conducted in accordance with ethical standards of Helsinki Declaration and was approved by Institutional Non-invasive Research Ethics Board (approval number: 2018/11-03 and date: 03.05.2018). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
References
-
- Abecassis M, Bartlett ST, Collins AJ, Davis CL, Delmonico FL, Friedewald JJ, et al. Kidney transplantation as primary therapy for end-stage renal disease: a National Kidney Foundation/Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF/KDOQI™) Conference. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:471–480. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2390948/ .
-
- Takahashi A, Hu SL, Bostom A. Physical activity in kidney transplant recipients: a review. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;72:433–43. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.12.005 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Maia TO, Rocha LG, Bezerra SD, Marinho-Motriz PEM. Functional independence and mobility in kidney transplanted patients: cross-sectional study. Motriz J Phys Educ Unesp. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-6574201700030025 . - DOI
-
- Harhay MN, Rao MK, Woodside KJ, Johansen KL, Lentine KL, Tullius SG, et al. An overview of frailty in kidney transplantation: measurement, management and future considerations. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020;35:1099–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaa016 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Konel JM, Warsame F, Ying H, Haugen CE, Mountford A, Chu NM, et al. Depressive symptoms, frailty, and adverse outcomes among kidney transplant recipients. Clin Transplant. 2018;32:e13391. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440201/ .
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical