Shear Bond Strength and Microleakage of Fissure Sealant to Contaminated and Non-Contaminated Enamel: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
- PMID: 37904265
Shear Bond Strength and Microleakage of Fissure Sealant to Contaminated and Non-Contaminated Enamel: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to review the in vitro literature on shear bond strength (SBS) and microleakage of pit and fissure sealant materials in contaminated (water, human, or artificial saliva) and non-contaminated conditions. Methods: PubMed®, Web of Science™, Scopus®, Embase™, and Cochrane Library databases were used as data sources. Of the 974 studies identified, 56 were considered eligible for full-text screening and 32 were selected for data extraction. Results: The meta-analysis demonstrated that contaminated conditions decreased the SBS of the sealants by 4.33 MPa. In the contaminated subgroup analysis, both unfilled (Clinpro™, 3M™) and filled (FluroShield®, Dentsply) resin-based sealants achieved a similar SBS (P=0.82). Regarding the outcome measurements, extensive methodological heterogeneity was found among the studies for SBS measurements (I 2 equals greater than or equal to 84 percent; P<0.001), whereas homogeneity was found for microleakage (I 2 equals 84 percent; P=0.85). When evaluating resin-based sealants, the level of microleakage in the contaminated and non- contaminated groups was not significantly different (P=0.1). Conclusion: Surface contamination decreases the bond strength between contaminated enamel and both unfilled and filled resin-based sealants, which affects the clinical effectiveness of sealants.
Similar articles
-
Shear bond strength of pit-and-fissure sealants to saliva-contaminated and noncontaminated enamel.J Dent Child (Chic). 2005 Sep-Dec;72(3):95-9. J Dent Child (Chic). 2005. PMID: 16568912
-
Bond strength of a pit-and-fissure sealant associated to etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesive systems to saliva-contaminated enamel: individual vs. simultaneous light curing.Braz Dent J. 2008;19(4):341-7. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402008000400010. Braz Dent J. 2008. PMID: 19180325
-
Adhesion of three types of fissure sealant in saliva-contaminated and noncontaminated conditions: an in vitro study.Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021 Oct;22(5):813-821. doi: 10.1007/s40368-021-00626-1. Epub 2021 Jun 1. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021. PMID: 34061332
-
Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature.Pediatr Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;24(5):393-414. Pediatr Dent. 2002. PMID: 12412954 Review.
-
Factors that Affect the Shear Bond Strength of Pit and Fissure Sealants to Tooth Structure: A Systematic Review.Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2023 Nov 30;31(4):332-345. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2503Ferreira14. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2023. PMID: 37721539
Cited by
-
Enhancing elemental release and antibacterial properties of resin-based dental sealants with calcium phosphate, bioactive glass, and polylysine.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 18;25(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05489-2. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 39827118 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources