Rational design of the genetic code expansion toolkit for in vivo encoding of D-amino acids
- PMID: 37904728
- PMCID: PMC10613524
- DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1277489
Rational design of the genetic code expansion toolkit for in vivo encoding of D-amino acids
Abstract
Once thought to be non-naturally occurring, D-amino acids (DAAs) have in recent years been revealed to play a wide range of physiological roles across the tree of life, including in human systems. Synthetic biologists have since exploited DAAs' unique biophysical properties to generate peptides and proteins with novel or enhanced functions. However, while peptides and small proteins containing DAAs can be efficiently prepared in vitro, producing large-sized heterochiral proteins poses as a major challenge mainly due to absence of pre-existing DAA translational machinery and presence of endogenous chiral discriminators. Based on our previous work demonstrating pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase's (PylRS') remarkable substrate polyspecificity, this work attempts to increase PylRS' ability in directly charging tRNAPyl with D-phenylalanine analogs (DFAs). We here report a novel, polyspecific Methanosarcina mazei PylRS mutant, DFRS2, capable of incorporating DFAs into proteins via ribosomal synthesis in vivo. To validate its utility, in vivo translational DAA substitution were performed in superfolder green fluorescent protein and human heavy chain ferritin, successfully altering both proteins' physiochemical properties. Furthermore, aminoacylation kinetic assays further demonstrated aminoacylation of DFAs by DFRS2 in vitro.
Keywords: D-phenylalanine analogs; amber suppression; genetic code expansion; noncanonical amino acids; pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase; synthetic biology.
Copyright © 2023 Jiang, Weng, Wang, Tsou, Chen, Ko, Söll, Tsai and Wang.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Figures



References
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources