Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 31;23(1):371.
doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-03004-x.

Endoscopic iatrogenic esophageal perforation and management: a retrospective outcome analysis in the modern era

Affiliations

Endoscopic iatrogenic esophageal perforation and management: a retrospective outcome analysis in the modern era

Eric M Montminy et al. BMC Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Iatrogenic esophageal perforation (IEP) is a severe adverse event (AE) of upper endoscopy procedures (UEPs) associated with morbidity. Management has shifted from surgery to endotherapy with clip closure (CC), self-expanding metal stent (SEMS), and vacuum therapy (VT). Limited analyses measure outcomes during contemporary interventional endoscopy periods.

Methods: IEPs associated with EGD, upper EUS, small bowel enteroscopy (SBE), and ERCP at a 3-hospital academic center from January 2011 to December 2023 were identified retrospectively from a centralized AE database. Additional information was obtained from medical records. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel and STATA.

Results: Thirty-two IEPs from 26 EGDs, 4 EUS, 1 SBE, and 1 ERCP were identified. IEPs occurred mostly after dilation (bougie N = 7; balloon, N = 5) or foreign body removal (N = 6). Most IEPs occurred in the lower esophagus (N = 10) or gastroesophageal junction (N = 8). Diagnosis was made at a median 2 h after the injury by endoscopy (N = 14), CT scan (N = 12), esophagram (N = 5), or x-ray (N = 1). Initial treatment included conservative therapy alone (N = 7), CC (N = 3), SEMS (N = 14), SEMS plus CC (N = 3), or surgery (N = 3). Eleven patients required additional treatment including repeat SEMS or adjustment (N = 4) or VT (N = 1). No surgical interventions were required after 2013. The median hospital stay was 3 days. Disposition included discharge to home (N = 25), long-term care facility (N = 2), 4 deaths (12.5% of IEPs), and 1 unknown.

Conclusions: IEPs are rare and occur throughout the esophagus after any UEP. The majority are recognized immediately and managed with endotherapy, or rarely, surgery today. These characteristics likely explain the low mortality in this study.

Keywords: Adverse events; Iatrogenic esophageal perforation; Interventional endoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Iatrogenic esophageal perforation during an upper endoscopic procedure treated with a fully covered SEMS. A demonstrates the perforation in the esophagus represented on CT Chest with free air in the mediastinum. B demonstrates the endoscopic visualization of perforation with a guidewire in the esophageal lumen. C demonstrates placement of the fully covered SEMS. D demonstrates healing of the IEP after stent is removed

References

    1. Swei E, Heller JC, Attwell AR. Adverse Event Fatalities Related to GI Endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2022;67(5):1753–1760. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-06981-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Forbes N, Coelho-Prabhu N, Al-Haddad MA, et al. Adverse events associated with EUS and EUS-guided procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;95(1):16–26.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sdralis EK, Petousis S, Rashid F, et al. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of esophageal perforations: systemic review. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(8):1–6. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deng Y, Hou L, Qin D, et al. Current treatment and outcome of esophageal perforation. Medicine. 2021;100(16):e25600. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025600. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Axtell AL, Gaissert HA, Morse CR, et al. Management and outcomes of esophageal perforation. Dis Esophagus. 2022;35(1):doab039. doi: 10.1093/dote/doab039. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources