Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel versus Conventional Technique for Thoracolumbar Spinal Decompression: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 37908536
- PMCID: PMC10615604
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768627
Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel versus Conventional Technique for Thoracolumbar Spinal Decompression: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Objective The purpose of the present study is to compare intraoperative blood loss, operating time, laminectomy time, hospital length of stay, and complications in thoracolumbar spinal decompression using ultrasonic bone scalpels (UBSs) with conventional procedures. Methods Forty-two patients who underwent decompressive laminectomy and pedicular screw fusion with a surgical level of 1-5 levels between February 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022, in a single institution were evaluated for eligibility, and 11 were excluded due to a history of spinal surgery ( n = 3), spinal tumor ( n = 3), and spinal infection ( n = 5). A total of 31 patients were randomly divided into the UBS group ( n =15) and the conventional group ( n =16). Intraoperative blood loss, operating time, laminectomy time, hospital length of stay, and complications were recorded. Results Intraoperative blood loss and laminectomy time were significantly lower in the UBS group (656.0 ± 167.6 ml, 54.5 ± 27.4 minutes, respectively) than in the conventional group (936.9 ± 413.2 ml, 73.4 ± 28.1 minutes, respectively). Overall operation time, hospital length of stay, and complications were all similar between the groups. Conclusion The UBS is a useful instrument for procedures performed near the dura mater or other neural tissue without excessive heat or mechanical injury. This device is recommended for various spinal surgeries in addition to high-speed burrs and Kerrison rongeurs.
Keywords: decompression, surgical; laminectomy; randomized controlled trial; thoracic vertebrae; ultrasonics.
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).
Conflict of interest statement
Conflito de Interesses Os autores não têm conflitos de interesses a declarar.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Ultrasonic bone scalpel for thoracic spinal decompression: case series and technical note.J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 8;15(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01838-9. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 32771031 Free PMC article.
-
[Effects of ultrasonic bone curettes combined with high-speed drills in posterior laminectomy and decompression procedure for severe thoracic spinal stenosis].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 25;100(7):521-526. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.07.009. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020. PMID: 32164104 Chinese.
-
The Reliability of the Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Comparative Study of 46 Patients.World Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;84(6):1962-7. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.043. Epub 2015 Sep 3. World Neurosurg. 2015. PMID: 26342784
-
Ultrasonic bone curette in thoracic spinal decompression: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 May;27(10):4450-4461. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202305_32451. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37259726
-
Combined pedicle screw fixation at the fracture vertebrae versus conventional method for thoracolumbar fractures: A meta-analysis.Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 11. Int J Surg. 2018. PMID: 29535015 Review.
Cited by
-
Safety and efficacy of ultrasonic bone scalpel compared with a high-speed drill in spinal surgery: our experience in sixty cases.Int Orthop. 2025 May;49(5):1199-1210. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06474-8. Epub 2025 Mar 1. Int Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40024943
References
-
- Huang Y H, Ou C Y. Significant Blood Loss in Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Spine. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(03):780–785. - PubMed
-
- Pereira B J, de Holanda C V, Ribeiro C A et al.Spinal surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease: Predictors of outcome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;140:1–5. - PubMed
-
- Takai K, Matsumoto T, Yabusaki H, Yokosuka J, Hatanaka R, Taniguchi M. Surgical complications associated with spinal decompression surgery in a Japanese cohort. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;26:110–115. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources