Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 21;4(11):101258.
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101258. Epub 2023 Oct 30.

Deep immunological imprinting due to the ancestral spike in the current bivalent COVID-19 vaccine

Affiliations

Deep immunological imprinting due to the ancestral spike in the current bivalent COVID-19 vaccine

Qian Wang et al. Cell Rep Med. .

Abstract

To combat the evolving SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants, bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, encoding both ancestral and Omicron BA.5 spikes, have replaced monovalent vaccines in numerous countries. However, fourth doses of either vaccine result in similar neutralizing antibody titers against Omicron subvariants, raising the possibility of immunological imprinting. To address this, we investigate antibody responses in 72 participants given three doses of a monovalent mRNA vaccine, followed by a bivalent or monovalent booster, or those with breakthrough infections with BA.5 or BQ. Bivalent boosters do not show notably higher binding or virus-neutralizing titers against various SARS-CoV-2 variants compared to monovalent ones. However, breakthrough infections lead to significantly better neutralization of Omicron subvariants. Multiple analyses, including antigenic mapping, suggest that the ancestral spike in bivalent vaccines is causing deep immunological imprinting, preventing broadening of antibodies to the BA.5 component, thereby defeating its intended goal. Its removal from future vaccine compositions is therefore strongly recommended.

Keywords: COVID-19; Omicron BA.5 spike; SARS-CoV-2; ancestral spike; antigenic distance; bivalent mRNA vaccine; immunological imprinting; serum neutralization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests The authors declare potential conflicts of interest as follows: D.D.H. is a co-founder of TaiMed Biologics and RenBio, as well as a board director for Vicarious Surgical; he also serves as a consultant to WuXi Biologics, Brii Biosciences, and Veru; and he receives research support from Regeneron. A.G. served on a scientific advisory board for Janssen Pharmaceuticals.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses to D614G and Omicron subvariants following monovalent booster, bivalent booster, or breakthrough infection (A) EC50 titers of binding antibodies in the serum samples from participants who received four doses of a monovalent mRNA vaccine (4-dose monovalent), three doses of a monovalent mRNA vaccine followed by one dose of a bivalent vaccine (3-dose monovalent + bivalent), and experienced BA.5 (BA.5 breakthrough) or BQ (BQ breakthrough) breakthrough infections after two to four doses of vaccine. (B) ID50 titers of neutralizing antibodies in the serum samples from “4-dose monovalent,” “3-dose monovalent + bivalent,” “BA.5 breakthrough,” and “BQ breakthrough” cohorts against D614G and Omicron subvariants. Breakthrough serum samples were separated into two sub-groups using two distinct symbols. Square symbols indicate samples from individuals who received three doses of monovalent vaccines followed by a breakthrough infection. Round symbols indicate samples from individuals who received four or five doses of monovalent vaccines and subsequently had a breakthrough infection. dpv, days post last vaccination; dpi, days post infection. The numbers in parentheses represent the mean days post last vaccination (dpv) or the mean days post infection (dpi). (C) Serum-neutralizing ID50 titers against XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16, and XBB.1.5 carrying the individual spike mutations found in XBB.1.16. Values above symbols indicate the geometric mean EC50 or IC50 titers for each cohort. The neutralization assay limit of detection (LOD) is 50 (dotted line), and the number of samples below the LOD is denoted above the x axis. Comparisons were made against “3-dose monovalent + bivalent” cohort (A) or XBB.1.5 (B and C) by Mann-Whitney tests. ns, not significant; ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Sample sizes (n) are shown in (B). See also Tables S1 and S2.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Deep immunological imprinting caused by the ancestral spike in bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccines impaired serum-neutralizing antibody responses to Omicron subvariants (A) Antigenic map derived from the neutralization data in Figure 1B. SARS-CoV-2 variants and sera are shown as colored circles and squares, respectively. The x and y axes represent antigenic units (AU), with each grid corresponding to a 2-fold serum dilution of the neutralization titer, as defined by the RACMACS package (https://github.com/acorg/Racmacs/tree/master). (B) Neutralizing antibody responses induced by a fourth dose of a bivalent mRNA vaccine compared to a fourth dose of the original monovalent booster or breakthrough infections. The values above the symbols indicate the geometric mean ID50 titer for each cohort. The assay limit of detection (LOD = 50) is represented by a dotted line. Comparisons were made against 3-dose monovalent + bivalent cohort by Mann-Whitney test, and the statistical significance is represented as ∗p < 0.05 or ∗∗p < 0.01. The numbers in parentheses represent the mean days post last vaccination (dpv) or the mean days post infection (dpi). (C) Antigenic maps for individual cohorts against D614G, BA.5, and BQ.1.1. Arrows indicate the antigenic distances from D614G to BA.5 (green) and BQ.1.1 (magenta). See also Figure S1.

Comment in

References

    1. FDA . 2023. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes Changes to Simplify Use of Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines.https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19...
    1. Wang Q., Bowen A., Valdez R., Gherasim C., Gordon A., Liu L., Ho D.D. Antibody Response to Omicron BA.4-BA.5 Bivalent Booster. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023;388:567–569. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2213907. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang Q., Bowen A., Tam A.R., Valdez R., Stoneman E., Mellis I.A., Gordon A., Liu L., Ho D.D. SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies after bivalent versus monovalent booster. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2023;23:527–528. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00181-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collier A.R.Y., Miller J., Hachmann N.P., McMahan K., Liu J., Bondzie E.A., Gallup L., Rowe M., Schonberg E., Thai S., et al. Immunogenicity of BA.5 Bivalent mRNA Vaccine Boosters. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023;388:565–567. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2213948. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davis-Gardner M.E., Lai L., Wali B., Samaha H., Solis D., Lee M., Porter-Morrison A., Hentenaar I.T., Yamamoto F., Godbole S., et al. Neutralization against BA.2.75.2, BQ.1.1, and XBB from mRNA Bivalent Booster. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023;388:183–185. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2214293. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Supplementary concepts