Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13876.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13876. Epub 2023 Nov 1.

Perspectives of women living with type 1 diabetes regarding preconception and antenatal care: A qualitative evidence synthesis

Affiliations
Review

Perspectives of women living with type 1 diabetes regarding preconception and antenatal care: A qualitative evidence synthesis

Ana Toledo-Chavarri et al. Health Expect. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnant women with type 1 diabetes may have an increased risk of complications for both the baby and themselves. Educational programmes, preconception planning, strict glycemic control and comprehensive medical care are some of the antenatal interventions that have been proposed to improve the outcomes of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. While some evidence-based recommendations about antenatal care are included in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), the views, and experiences of women with type 1 diabetes about these interventions are not well known.

Aim: To understand and synthesize the perceptions of women with type 1 diabetes about the interventions before pregnancy.

Method: A qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) was carried out with a framework analysis guided by the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group approach. Three online databases (Medline, Embase and Web of Science) were searched. We included qualitative articles that were published from 2011 to 2021 and which were available in English or Spanish.

Findings: Ten references met the inclusion criteria of the study and were included. Three main themes were identified: (a) acceptability of antenatal care, (b) feasibility and implementation consideration and (c) equity and accessibility difficulties.

Conclusion: Continuity of care, coordination between health professionals and services, and a more holistic approach are the key aspects women say need to be considered for more acceptable, feasible and equitable preconception and antenatal care.

Patient or public contribution: This QES was carried out as part of the CPGs on diabetes mellitus type 1, carried out as part of the Spanish Network of Health Technology Assessment Agencies. In this CPG, the representatives of the patient associations are Francisco Javier Darias Yanes, from the Association for Diabetes of Tenerife, who has participated in all the phases of the CPG; Aureliano Ruiz Salmón and Julián Antonio González Hernández (representatives of the Spanish Diabetes Federation (FEDE) who have participated as collaborator and external reviewer, respectively.

Keywords: preconception care; pregnancy; qualitative evidence synthesis; type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram. For more information, visit: http://www.prisma-statement.org/. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Persson M, Norman M, Hanson U. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in type 1 diabetic pregnancies. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(11):2005‐2009. 10.2337/DC09-0656 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Magon N, Chauhan M. Pregnancy in type 1 diabetes mellitus: how special are special issues? N Am J Med Sci. 2012;4(6):250. 10.4103/1947-2714.97202 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Colstrup M, Mathiesen ER, Damm P, Jensen DM, Ringholm L. Pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes: have the goals of St. Vincent declaration been met concerning foetal and neonatal complications? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(17):1682‐1686. 10.3109/14767058.2013.794214 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miailhe G, Le Ray C, Timsit J, Lepercq J. Factors associated with urgent cesarean delivery in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(5):983‐989. 10.1097/AOG.0B013E31828B6D97 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malaza N, Masete M, Adam S, Dias S, Nyawo T, Pheiffer C. A systematic review to compare adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with pregestational diabetes and gestational diabetes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(17):10846. 10.3390/ijerph191710846 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types