Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 9;33(1):63-71.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0763.

Patient Willingness to Use a Pharmacy-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Service: A National Survey of U.S. Adults

Affiliations

Patient Willingness to Use a Pharmacy-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Service: A National Survey of U.S. Adults

Parth D Shah et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. .

Abstract

Background: We aimed to understand U.S. adults' willingness to use a pharmacy-based fecal immunochemical test (FIT) distribution service for routine colorectal cancer screening called PharmFIT using Diffusion of Innovation Theory, evaluating patient's appraisals of the program's relative advantage, compatibility, and complexity.

Methods: From March to April 2021, we conducted a national online survey of 1,045 U.S. adults ages 45 to 75. We identified correlates of patient willingness to use PharmFIT using structural equation modeling.

Results: Most respondents (72%) were willing to get a FIT from their pharmacy for their regular colorectal cancer screening. Respondents were more willing to participate in PharmFIT if they perceived higher relative advantage ($\hat{\beta}$= 0.184; confidence interval, CI95%: 0.055-0.325) and perceived higher compatibility ($\hat{\beta}$ = 0.422; CI95%: 0.253-0.599) to get screened in a pharmacy, had longer travel times to their primary health care provider ($\hat{\beta}$ = 0.007; CI95%: 0.004-0.010). Respondents were less willing to participate in PharmFIT if they were 65 years or older ($\hat{\beta}$ = -0.220; CI95%: -0.362 to -0.070).

Conclusions: Most U.S. adults would be willing to participate in PharmFIT for their routine colorectal cancer screening. Patient perceptions of the relative advantage and compatibility of PharmFIT were strongly associated with their willingness to use PharmFIT. Pharmacies should account for patient preferences for these two traits of PharmFIT to increase adoption and use.

Impact: Pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening may be a viable public health strategy to significantly increase equitable access to screening for U.S. residents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures or conflicts of interest. The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Willingness to participate in different steps of PharmFIT (n=1,045). Proportion of survey responders who agreed or disagreed to be willing to participate in different steps of PharmFIT.

References

    1. Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, Cabana M, Caughey AB, Davis EM, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021;325:1965–77. - PubMed
    1. National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Data & Progress [Internet]. 2023. [cited 2023 Aug 24]. Available from: https://nccrt.org/data-progress/
    1. Valliant SN, Burbage SC, Pathak S, Urick BY. Pharmacists as accessible health-care providers: quantifying the opportunity. JManag Care Spec Pharm 2022;28: 85–90 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berenbrok LA, Tang S, Gabriel N, Guo J, Sharareh N, Patel N, et al. Access to community pharmacies: A nationwide geographic information systems cross-sectional analysis. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022; - PubMed
    1. Kelling SE. View of Exploring Accessibility of Community Pharmacy Services. Inov Pharm. 2015;6:Article 210.

Publication types