Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation in Patients Taking Antihypertensive Medications
- PMID: 37914510
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.045
Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation in Patients Taking Antihypertensive Medications
Abstract
Background: Renal denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure (BP) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications.
Objectives: This trial assessed the safety and efficacy of RDN in the presence of antihypertensive medications.
Methods: SPYRAL HTN-ON MED is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded trial enrolling patients from 56 clinical centers worldwide. Patients were prescribed 1 to 3 antihypertensive medications. Patients were randomized to radiofrequency RDN or sham control procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the baseline-adjusted change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP at 6 months between groups using a Bayesian trial design and analysis.
Results: The treatment difference in the mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP from baseline to 6 months between the RDN group (n = 206; -6.5 ± 10.7 mm Hg) and sham control group (n = 131; -4.5 ± 10.3 mm Hg) was -1.9 mm Hg (95% CI: -4.4 to 0.5 mm Hg; P = 0.12). There was no significant difference between groups in the primary efficacy analysis with a posterior probability of superiority of 0.51 (Bayesian treatment difference: -0.03 mm Hg [95% CI: -2.82 to 2.77 mm Hg]). However, there were changes and increases in medication intensity among sham control patients. RDN was associated with a reduction in office systolic BP compared with sham control at 6 months (adjusted treatment difference: -4.9 mm Hg; P = 0.0015). Night-time BP reductions and win ratio analysis also favored RDN. There was 1 adverse safety event among 253 assessed patients.
Conclusions: There was no significant difference between groups in the primary analysis. However, multiple secondary endpoint analyses favored RDN over sham control. (SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Study [Global Clinical Study of Renal Denervation With the Symplicity Spyral Multi-electrode Renal Denervation System in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension in the Absence of Antihypertensive Medications]; NCT02439775).
Keywords: Bayesian trial; antihypertensive medications; renal denervation; uncontrolled hypertension; win ratio.
Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was funded by Medtronic. Dr Kandzari has received institutional research/grant support from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc, Orbus Neich, Teleflex, Medtronic, and Ablative Solutions; and has received personal consulting honoraria from Cardiovascular Systems, Inc, Medtronic, and Abbott Vascular. Dr Townsend is a consultant for Medtronic, Cytel, and Janssen. Dr Kario has received personal fees from Medtronic during the conduct of the study; has received grants from A&D Company, Omron Healthcare, Fukuda Denshi, CureApp, Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho, Teijin Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, and Fukuda Lifetec; has received consulting fees from A&D Company, JIMRO, Omron Healthcare, CureApp, Terumo, and Fukuda Denshi; has received honoraria from Otsuka Pharmaceuticals and Omron Healthcare; and has participated on the Advisory Board of Fukuda Denshi, outside of the submitted work. Dr Mahfoud is supported by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (DGK), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TRR219), and Deutsche Herzstiftung; has received scientific support from Ablative Solutions, Medtronic, and ReCor Medical; and has received speaker honoraria/consulting fees from Ablative Solutions, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Inari, Medtronic, Merck, ReCor Medical, Servier, and Terumo. Dr Weber has received consulting fees from Medtronic, ReCor, Ablative Solutions, Johnson and Johnson, and Urovant. Dr Schmieder has received grants and personal fees from Medtronic, Recor, and Ablative Solutions. Dr Pocock has received personal fees from Medtronic outside of the submitted work. Dr Tsioufis has received institutional research/grant support from Medtronic and ReCor Medical; and has received personal consulting honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, ReCor Medical, SERVIER, WinMedica, and ELPEN. Dr Konstantinidis receives payments from Medtronic for work as research center secondary investigator. Dr Choi has received consulting fees from Medtronic, outside of the submitted work. Dr East has received consulting fees from Medtronic. Dr Lauder has received speaker fees and honoraria from Medtronic and ReCor Medical. Dr Cohen has received research support and consultant fees from Medtronic and ReCor; and receives fees from Metavention, outside of the submitted work. Dr Kobayashi is on the advisory board and Speakers Bureau for Medtronic and ReCor Medical. Dr Lee has received grants from and serves on the advisory board for Medtronic, outside of the submitted work. Dr Weil has received support from Medtronic, Recor Medical, Novartis, and AstraZeneca. Dr Agdirlioglu receives speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novartis, outside of the submitted work. Dr Schlaich has received consulting fees and/or travel and research support from Medtronic, Abbott, Novartis, Servier, Pfizer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Shetty has received consulting and speaker fees from Medtronic. Dr Devireddy has received personal fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, ReCor Medical, and Shockwave Medical, outside of the submitted work. Dr Sharp has received personal fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Recor Medical, and Philips, outside the submitted work. Dr Anderson has received speaker fees from Shockwave Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Mr Fahy, Mrs DeBruin, and Dr Brar are employees of Medtronic. Dr Böhm is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation; TTR 219, project number 322900939); and has received personal fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Novartis, ReCor, Servier, and Vifor during the conduct of the study. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Comment in
-
The Ongoing Odyssey of Renal Denervation.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Nov 7;82(19):1824-1827. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.795. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 37914511 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Impact of Antihypertensive Medication Changes After Renal Denervation Among Different Patient Groups: SPYRAL HTN-ON MED.Hypertension. 2024 May;81(5):1095-1105. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.22251. Epub 2024 Feb 5. Hypertension. 2024. PMID: 38314554 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation: 24-Month Results From the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Trial.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;18(7):e015194. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015194. Epub 2025 May 20. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025. PMID: 40391448 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term efficacy and safety of renal denervation in the presence of antihypertensive drugs (SPYRAL HTN-ON MED): a randomised, sham-controlled trial.Lancet. 2022 Apr 9;399(10333):1401-1410. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00455-X. Epub 2022 Apr 4. Lancet. 2022. PMID: 35390320 Clinical Trial.
-
Renal Denervation for Treating Hypertension: Current Scientific and Clinical Evidence.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 24;12(12):1095-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.050. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019. PMID: 31221299 Review.
-
Randomized Trials of Renal Denervation for Uncontrolled Hypertension: An Updated Meta-Analysis.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e034910. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034910. Epub 2024 Aug 14. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 39140334 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Medication Changes After Renal Denervation: Current Evidence and Patient Perspectives.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Dec 17;13(24):e037187. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037187. Epub 2024 Dec 14. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 39673343 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessing the efficacy of renal denervation in patients with resistant arterial hypertension : Systematic review and meta-analysis.Herz. 2025 Feb;50(1):34-41. doi: 10.1007/s00059-024-05268-9. Epub 2024 Sep 10. Herz. 2025. PMID: 39254858 English.
-
Renal Denervation for Hypertension: Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives.Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2025 Aug 12;27(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s11883-025-01326-7. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2025. PMID: 40794217 Review.
-
Impact of Antihypertensive Medication Changes After Renal Denervation Among Different Patient Groups: SPYRAL HTN-ON MED.Hypertension. 2024 May;81(5):1095-1105. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.22251. Epub 2024 Feb 5. Hypertension. 2024. PMID: 38314554 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Indications for renal denervation in the treatment of hypertension.Hypertens Res. 2024 Oct;47(10):2693-2699. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01823-3. Epub 2024 Aug 7. Hypertens Res. 2024. PMID: 39112539 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous