Patient-reported outcomes following dental implant rehabilitation according to reason for missing teeth: A survey from a Norwegian population 8 years following treatment
- PMID: 37915235
- DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13895
Patient-reported outcomes following dental implant rehabilitation according to reason for missing teeth: A survey from a Norwegian population 8 years following treatment
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) 8 years after dental implant rehabilitation in a sample with tooth loss due to periodontitis (TLP) and a sample with missing teeth for other reasons (MTOR).
Materials and methods: The Norwegian National Insurance Scheme registry of subsidized dental implant therapy was searched, and patients (n = 3083) rehabilitated with dental implants in 2014 were mailed a questionnaire. PROs were described by relative frequencies, and the TLP and MTOR subsamples were compared using chi-square test. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to investigate variables potentially predicting PROs.
Results: Of the respondents (n = 1299), more than 90% were partly or fully satisfied with the treatment outcome. Complications were reported by 44.2%. Patients who lost teeth due to periodontitis (n = 784) reported greater oral function improvement and better pre-treatment information, and were more likely to experience complications when compared with patients who lost teeth for other reasons (n = 515). Age, level of education, self-funded cost, pre-treatment information, history of complications and the reason for missing teeth were found to predict PROs.
Conclusions: In a Norwegian population rehabilitated with dental implants in 2014, satisfaction with the treatment outcome and the aesthetic outcome was high, irrespective of the reason for missing teeth. Self-report of complications and lack of pre-treatment information were the strongest predictors of inferior patient satisfaction and also predicted inferior oral function.
Keywords: dental implant(s); oral rehabilitation; patient outcomes; patient satisfaction; peri-implant diseases.
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
Patient-reported outcomes following implants.Br Dent J. 2023 Dec;235(12):965. doi: 10.1038/s41415-023-6669-9. Br Dent J. 2023. PMID: 38102270 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Adler, L., Buhlin, K., & Jansson, L. (2020). Survival and complications: A 9-to 15-year retrospective follow-up of dental implant therapy. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 47(1), 67-77.
-
- Adler, L., Liedholm, E., Silvegren, M., Modin, C., Buhlin, K., & Jansson, L. (2016). Patient satisfaction 8-14 years after dental implant therapy - A questionnaire study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 74(5), 423-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2016.1177661
-
- Afrashtehfar, K. I., Assery, M. K., & Bryant, S. R. (2020). Patient satisfaction in medicine and dentistry. International Journal of Dentistry, 2020, 6621848. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6621848
-
- Baracat, L. F., Teixeira, A. M., dos Santos, M. B. F., da Cunha, V. d. P. P., & Marchini, L. (2011). Patients' expectations before and evaluation after dental implant therapy. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 13(2), 141-145.
-
- Buhlin, K., Gustafsson, A., Andersson, K., Håkansson, J., & Klinge, B. (2002). Validity and limitations of self-reported periodontal health. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 30(6), 431-437.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous