Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;73(5):428-433.
doi: 10.1007/s13224-023-01800-9. Epub 2023 Jul 18.

Randomised Control Study of Misoprostol and Mifepristone versus Misoprostol Alone in Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy

Affiliations

Randomised Control Study of Misoprostol and Mifepristone versus Misoprostol Alone in Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy

Ajit Kumar Nayak et al. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: This study was done to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of mifepristone and misoprostol combination versus misoprostol alone for second trimester termination of pregnancy in relation to induction abortion interval, average amount of misoprostol required in each group, success rate and side effects.

Materials and methods: This randomised control study was conducted on 100 women admitted in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, S.C.B. Medical College & Hospital, Cuttack, for second trimester termination of pregnancy, divided into two groups, Group A and Group B of 50 patients each. Group A patients received 200 mg of oral mifepristone followed by 400 mcg of vaginal misoprostol after 48 h, and then 400 mcg of vaginal misoprostol every 3 hourly until complete expulsion or up to a maximum of 6 doses. Group B patients received 400 mcg of vaginal misoprostol every 3 hourly until complete expulsion or up to maximum 6 doses.

Results: Complete abortion was seen in 92% and 72% cases in Group A and Group B, respectively. Mean induction abortion interval was 11.59 ± 2.71 h in Group A and 15.57 ± 2.27 h in Group B (p value < 0.001). The average dose of misoprostol required was less in combination regimen, i.e. 1128 ± 384 mcg compared to 1680 ± 302 mcg in misoprostol alone group (p value < 0.001). Side effects like nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea were less in combination regimen than misoprostol alone group.

Conclusion: Mifepristone and misoprostol combination is more effective and safer alternative than misoprostol alone in second trimester termination of pregnancy.

Keywords: Induction–abortion interval; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Second trimester termination of pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of InterestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of mean gestational age (in weeks)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dastgiri S, Yoosefian M, Garjani M, et al. Induced abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mater Sociomed. 2017;29(1):58–67. doi: 10.5455/msm.2017.29.58-67. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh S, Shekhar C, Acharya R, et al. The incidence of abortion and unintended pregnancy in India, 2015. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e111–e120. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30453-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karena ZV, Shah H, Vaghela H, et al. Clinical utility of mifepristone: apprising the expanding horizons. Cureus. 2022;14(8):e28318. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28318. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frye LJ, Byrne ME, Winikoff B. A crossover pharmacokinetic study of misoprostol by the oral, sublingual and buccal routes. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(4):265–268. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2016.1168799. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siraneh Y, Workneh A. Determinants and outcome of safe second trimester medical abortion at Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia. J Pregnancy. 2019;7(2019):4513827. doi: 10.1155/2019/4513827. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources