Validation of the Austin Assessment: A screening tool for cerebral visual impairment related visual issues
- PMID: 37917596
- PMCID: PMC10621811
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293904
Validation of the Austin Assessment: A screening tool for cerebral visual impairment related visual issues
Abstract
Cerebral visual impairment is the most common cause of vision impairment affecting children in the economically developed world with a prevalence rate of approximately 3.4%. Currently there are limited options for screening for cerebral visual impairment, resulting in many children going undiagnosed, especially those that have normal visual acuity. The aim of this research was to validate an iPad App called the Austin Assessment, which was developed as a potential screening tool for cerebral visual impairment related visual issues. The research involved three separate phases: (1) creating a database of normative ranges for children aged 5-18 across the different variables of the Austin Assessment, (2) using the Austin Assessment to screen children aged 5-13 to assess the effectiveness of the Austin Assessment as a screening tool for CVI related visual issues, and (3) conducting specific validation research assessing children using the Austin Assessment and an already validated visual search tool. Each phase used different quantitative research methodologies to help show the effectiveness of the Austin Assessment as a screening tool for cerebral visual impairment related visual issues. From phase one of the research, thresholds were established for three variables of the Austin Assessment for the age groupings of 5-8, 9-12 and 13-18. If a child meets one of these thresholds this indicates further assessment is required to determine if they do in fact have cerebral visual impairment related visual issues. Phase two identified 17 children out of 270 who had clinical findings indicating visual issues; potentially indicative of CVI; investigation into the nature of these visual issues is ongoing. Phase three found that the Austin Assessment has moderate diagnostic value for each age group, with good sensitivity and specificity, making it effective at distinguishing those children who have visual issues from those who have typical vision. Further investigation is needed to confirm this initial validation.
Copyright: © 2023 McDowell, Butler. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
What assessments are currently used to investigate and diagnose cerebral visual impairment (CVI) in children? A systematic review.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 Mar;41(2):224-244. doi: 10.1111/opo.12776. Epub 2020 Dec 27. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021. PMID: 33368471 Free PMC article.
-
Methods of visual assessment in children with cortical visual impairment.Curr Opin Neurol. 2021 Feb 1;34(1):89-96. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000877. Curr Opin Neurol. 2021. PMID: 33230032 Review.
-
Towards population screening for Cerebral Visual Impairment: Validity of the Five Questions and the CVI Questionnaire.PLoS One. 2019 Mar 26;14(3):e0214290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214290. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30913240 Free PMC article.
-
Vision Screening Assessment (VISA) tool: diagnostic accuracy validation of a novel screening tool in detecting visual impairment among stroke survivors.BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 11;10(6):e033639. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033639. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32532765 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for cerebral visual impairment: value of a CVI questionnaire.Neuropediatrics. 2011 Aug;42(4):138-47. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1285908. Epub 2011 Sep 12. Neuropediatrics. 2011. PMID: 21913154
Cited by
-
Gestalt, Navon and Kanizsa illusion processing in CVI, ADHD, and dyslexia Children with Normal verbal IQ.Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Dec 24;18:1496796. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1496796. eCollection 2024. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 39776782 Free PMC article.
-
Special Commentary: Cerebral/Cortical Visual Impairment Working Definition: A Report from the National Institutes of Health CVI Workshop.Ophthalmology. 2024 Dec;131(12):1359-1365. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.09.017. Ophthalmology. 2024. PMID: 39572128
-
Emulation of the subjective experience of visual dorsal stream dysfunction: a description of three in depth case studies.Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jan 6;18:1496811. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1496811. eCollection 2024. Front Hum Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 39834398 Free PMC article.
-
Hiding in plain sight: children with visual perceptual difficulties in schools.Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Nov 27;18:1496730. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1496730. eCollection 2024. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 39703800 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Manley CE, Bauer CM, Bex PJ, Merabet LB. Impaired visuospatial processing in cerebral visual impairment revealed by performance on a conjunction visual search task. British Journal of Visual Impairment. 2023.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical