Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 2;9(1):51.
doi: 10.1186/s40813-023-00345-7.

Spatiotemporal description of African swine fever virus nucleic acid and antibodies detected in pigs sampled at abattoirs in the greater Kampala metropolitan area, Uganda from May 2021 through June 2022

Affiliations

Spatiotemporal description of African swine fever virus nucleic acid and antibodies detected in pigs sampled at abattoirs in the greater Kampala metropolitan area, Uganda from May 2021 through June 2022

Rodney Okwasiimire et al. Porcine Health Manag. .

Abstract

Background: African swine fever virus (ASFV) infections in Africa cause hemorrhagic disease in domestic pigs and is maintained by a sylvatic cycle in warthogs. It is endemic in Uganda, leading to significant economic losses. Previous studies performed in rural areas and in Kampala had differing diagnostic results. The purpose of this study was to provide a robust spatial, temporal, and diagnostic summary of pigs slaughtered in the greater Kampala metropolitan area over the course of one year. This study characterized 1208 to 1323 serum, blood, and tissue samples collected from pigs at six abattoirs in the greater Kampala metropolitan area of Uganda monthly from May 2021 through June 2022. Validated and standardized serologic and molecular diagnostics were used.

Results: Only 0.15% of pigs had detectable antibodies against ASFV, suggesting low survival rates or pre-clinical diagnosis. Yet, 59.5% of pigs were positive for ASFV DNA. Blood had the lowest detection rate (15.3%) while tonsil and lymph nodes had the highest (38% and 37.5%, respectively), spleen samples (31.5%) were in between. Agreement between sample types was fair to moderate overall. A significant seasonality of ASFV infections emerged with infections found predominately in the dry seasons. Spatial assessments revealed that the greater Kampala metropolitan area abattoirs have a catchment area that overlaps with Uganda's most pig dense regions.

Conclusions: Pigs at greater Kampala metropolitan area abattoirs can be sentinels for acute disease throughout the pig dense region of Uganda, particularly in the dry seasons. The high prevalence detected suggests that pigs are sold in response to local reports of ASFV infections (panic sales). Serological surveillance is not useful, as very few pigs seroconverted in this study prior to slaughter. In contrast, tissue samples of pigs can be used to detect disease using qPCR methods.

Keywords: African swine Fever; ELISA; Uganda; qPCR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Percent positivity pigs by abattoir from which they were sampled in the Kampala area. A pig was positive if any tissue had African swine fever virus nucleic acid detected
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of African swine fever virus positive of samples from pigs slaughtered in Kampala. A statistical analysis comparing ASFV results by month of the year between May 2021 and June 2022 using a Pearson chi-squared had a p-value < 0.001 for all tissue types and the overall pig status
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
African swine fever percent positivity of pigs sampled from Kampala area abattoirs district of origin. Testing was completed using a real-time PCR assay for detection of nucleic acid. A pig was considered positive if any of the tissue samples from that pig were positive. Pigs with unknown districts of origin were excluded but had a percent positivity of 50%
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Ugandan map showing six abattoirs in the greater Kampala metropolitan area where pigs were sampled

References

    1. Dixon LK, Chapman DAG, Netherton CL, Upton C. African swine Fever virus replication and genomics. Virus Res. 2013;173(1):3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.10.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greig A, Plowright W. The excretion of two virulent strains of African swine Fever virus by domestic pigs. J Hygiene Camb. 1970;68:673–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Plowright W, Perry CT, Pierce MA, Parker J. Experimental Infection of the argasid tick, Ornithodoros moubata porcinus, with African swine Fever virus. Archiv fur die Gesamte Virusforschung. 1970;31:33–50. doi: 10.1007/BF01241664. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haresnape JM, Wilkinson PJ. A study of African swine Fever virus infected ticks (Ornithodoros moubata) collected from three villages in the ASF enzootic area of Malawi following an outbreak of the Disease in domestic pigs. Epidemiol Infect. 1989;102(3):507–22. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800030223. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Penrith ML, Bastos AD, Etter EMC, Beltran-Alcrudo D. Epidemiology of African swine Fever in Africa today: sylvatic cycle versus socio-economic imperatives. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019;66(2):672–86. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13117. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources